CMS-EXO-23-002

CMS-EXO-23-002 ; CERN-EP-2024-054
Search for soft unclustered energy patterns in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV
CMS Collaboration
8 March 2024
Submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett.
Abstract: The first search for soft unclustered energy patterns (SUEPs) is performed using an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$ ^{-1} $ of proton-proton collision data at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV, collected in 2016-2018 by the CMS detector at the LHC. Such SUEPs are predicted by Hidden Valley models with a new, confining force with a large 't Hooft coupling. In events with boosted topologies, selected by high-threshold hadronic triggers, the multiplicity and sphericity of clustered tracks are used to reject the background from standard model quantum chromodynamics. With no observed excess of events over the standard model expectation, limits are set on the cross section for production via gluon fusion of a scalar mediator with SUEP-like decays.
Links: e-print arXiv:2403.05311 [hep-ex] (PDF) ; CDS record ; inSPIRE record ; Physics Briefing ; CADI line (restricted) ;

Figures	Summary	Additional Figures & Tables	References	CMS Publications

Figures
png pdf	Figure 1: A schematic Feynman diagram of the benchmark signal model resulting in a SUEP signature.
png pdf	Figure 2: The number of observed events as a function of the number of tracks in the SUEP candidate, for all CRs A-H and the SR, as well as two signal samples. The three figures correspond to contiguous $ S^{\text{SUEP}}_{\text{boosted}} $ ranges. The pre-fit predicted background distribution is shown in the VR, the first bin of the SR. For all other regions and bins, the post-fit values for a background-only fit are shown.
png pdf	Figure 3: The 95% CL exclusion limits on the production cross section $ \sigma $ are shown as a function of $ m_{\text{S}} $ for $ m_{\phi} = T_{\text{D}} = $ 3 GeV, for all decay modes.
png pdf	Figure 4: The observed and expected exclusions for the nominal $ \text{S} $ cross section in the plane of $ m_{\phi} $ and $ T_{\text{D}} $, for various $ m_{\text{S}} $ values, for the case $ m_{{\mathrm{A}'}}= $ 1.0 GeV ($ {\mathrm{A}'} \to \pi^{+}\pi^{-} $ with $ \mathcal{B}= $ 100%). The regions below the observed limits are excluded.

Summary

In summary, this Letter presents the first search for soft unclustered energy patterns (SUEPs). Data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$ ^{-1} $ are used, collected with a trigger requiring a high scalar sum of jet transverse momenta and reconstructed with the full offline processing. This strategy preferentially selects events with initial-state radiation; the characteristic isotropic event shape of the SUEPs is recovered by boosting into the scalar mediator rest frame and removing the initial-state radiation particles. The number of tracks and the associated sphericity in the SUEP candidate are used to discriminate between the signal and the background from standard model quantum chromodynamics, which is estimated from data in suitable control regions. Stringent limits are placed on the most SUEP-like Hidden Valley scenarios with highly isotropic dark showers producing a large multiplicity of tracks.

Additional Figures
png pdf	Additional Figure 1: The 95% CL exclusion limits on the production cross section $ \sigma $ as a functions of $ m_{\text{S}} $ for various $ m_{\phi} $ and $ T_{\text{D}} $ values and all decay modes.
png pdf	Additional Figure 1-a: The 95% CL exclusion limits on the production cross section $ \sigma $ as a functions of $ m_{\text{S}} $ for various $ m_{\phi} $ and $ T_{\text{D}} $ values and all decay modes.
png pdf	Additional Figure 1-b: The 95% CL exclusion limits on the production cross section $ \sigma $ as a functions of $ m_{\text{S}} $ for various $ m_{\phi} $ and $ T_{\text{D}} $ values and all decay modes.
png pdf	Additional Figure 2: The 95% CL observed upper limits on the cross section as a function of $ T_{\text{D}} $ and the pseudoscalar mass $ m_{\phi} $ for $ m_{\text{S}} $ values of 300 GeV (upper), 600 GeV (middle), and 1000 GeV (lower), in the $ m_{\text{A}^{\prime}}= $ 1.0 GeV ($ \text{A}^{\prime} \to \pi^{+}\pi^{-} $ with $ \mathcal{B}=$ 100%) case. The solid dark blue curves indicate the observed exclusions for the nominal S cross section, while the dashed red curves indicate the expected exclusions, and the dashed light blue curves indicate the region containing 68% of the distributions of expected exclusions. The regions below the lines are excluded.
png pdf	Additional Figure 2-a: The 95% CL observed upper limits on the cross section as a function of $ T_{\text{D}} $ and the pseudoscalar mass $ m_{\phi} $ for $ m_{\text{S}} $ values of 300 GeV (upper), 600 GeV (middle), and 1000 GeV (lower), in the $ m_{\text{A}^{\prime}}= $ 1.0 GeV ($ \text{A}^{\prime} \to \pi^{+}\pi^{-} $ with $ \mathcal{B}=$ 100%) case. The solid dark blue curves indicate the observed exclusions for the nominal S cross section, while the dashed red curves indicate the expected exclusions, and the dashed light blue curves indicate the region containing 68% of the distributions of expected exclusions. The regions below the lines are excluded.
png pdf	Additional Figure 2-b: The 95% CL observed upper limits on the cross section as a function of $ T_{\text{D}} $ and the pseudoscalar mass $ m_{\phi} $ for $ m_{\text{S}} $ values of 300 GeV (upper), 600 GeV (middle), and 1000 GeV (lower), in the $ m_{\text{A}^{\prime}}= $ 1.0 GeV ($ \text{A}^{\prime} \to \pi^{+}\pi^{-} $ with $ \mathcal{B}=$ 100%) case. The solid dark blue curves indicate the observed exclusions for the nominal S cross section, while the dashed red curves indicate the expected exclusions, and the dashed light blue curves indicate the region containing 68% of the distributions of expected exclusions. The regions below the lines are excluded.
png pdf	Additional Figure 2-c: The 95% CL observed upper limits on the cross section as a function of $ T_{\text{D}} $ and the pseudoscalar mass $ m_{\phi} $ for $ m_{\text{S}} $ values of 300 GeV (upper), 600 GeV (middle), and 1000 GeV (lower), in the $ m_{\text{A}^{\prime}}= $ 1.0 GeV ($ \text{A}^{\prime} \to \pi^{+}\pi^{-} $ with $ \mathcal{B}=$ 100%) case. The solid dark blue curves indicate the observed exclusions for the nominal S cross section, while the dashed red curves indicate the expected exclusions, and the dashed light blue curves indicate the region containing 68% of the distributions of expected exclusions. The regions below the lines are excluded.
png pdf	Additional Figure 3: The observed and expected exclusions for the nominal S cross section for all $ m_{\text{S}} $ values, for the $ m_{\text{A}^{\prime}} = $ 0.5 GeV ($ \text{A}^{\prime} \to \mathrm{e}^+\mathrm{e}^-, \mu^{+}\mu^{-}, \pi^{+}\pi^{-} $ with $ \mathcal{B} = $ 40, 40, 20%) case, in the plane of $ m_{\phi} $ and $ T_{\text{D}} $. The regions below the lines are excluded.
png pdf	Additional Figure 4: The observed and expected exclusions for the nominal S cross section for all $ m_{\text{S}} $ values, for the $ m_{\text{A}^{\prime}} = $ 0.7 GeV ($ \text{A}^{\prime} \to \mathrm{e}^+\mathrm{e}^-, \mu^{+}\mu^{-}, \pi^{+}\pi^{-} $ with $ \mathcal{B} = $ 15, 15, 70%) case, in the plane of $ m_{\phi} $ and $ T_{\text{D}} $. The regions below the lines are excluded.
png pdf	Additional Figure 5: An example signal event from a representative model with $ m_{\text{S}}= $ 800 GeV in the lab frame (left) and the generator-level S mediator frame (right). The jets are clustered from charged particle tracks associated with the primary vertex using the anti-$ k_{\mathrm{T}} $ algorithm with $ R= $ 1.5. The size of each dot is scaled based on the $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ of the corresponding track.

Additional Tables
png pdf	Additional Table 1: The observed and predicted yields in the SR, applying the extended ABCD method to the ISR candidate. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. The deviation of the ratio from unity, averaged across all years, is taken as a systematic uncertainty in the final SR prediction to address higher-order correlations between the variables used in the extended ABCD method.
png pdf	Additional Table 2: The observed and predicted yields in the VR, which corresponds to the first bin in the SR, applying the extended ABCD method to the SUEP candidate. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown separately. (The VR is not used in the final fit.)
png pdf	Additional Table 3: The numbers of observed and predicted (post-fit) events for each SR bin.
png pdf	Additional Table 4: For a selection of signal samples in era 2018 with $ m_{\phi} = T_{\text{D}} = $ 3 GeV, the relative efficiencies and the total efficiency with respect to the selection on the generator-level $ H_{\mathrm{T}} $, $ H_{\text{T}}^{\text{gen}} > $ 1000 GeV.

References
1	M. Cvetic, P. Langacker, and G. Shiu	Phenomenology of a three family standard like string model	PRD 66 (2002) 066004	hep-ph/0205252
2	Z. Chacko, H.-S. Goh, and R. Harnik	The twin Higgs: Natural electroweak breaking from mirror symmetry	PRL 96 (2006) 231802	hep-ph/0506256
3	M. J. Strassler and K. M. Zurek	Echoes of a hidden valley at hadron colliders	PLB 651 (2007) 374	hep-ph/0604261
4	T. Hur, D.-W. Jung, P. Ko, and J. Y. Lee	Electroweak symmetry breaking and cold dark matter from strongly interacting hidden sector	PLB 696 (2011) 262	0709.1218
5	S. A. Abel et al.	Kinetic mixing of the photon with hidden U(1)s in string phenomenology	JHEP 07 (2008) 124	0803.1449
6	Y. Bai and P. Schwaller	Scale of dark QCD	PRD 89 (2014) 063522	1306.4676
7	M. J. Strassler	Why unparticle models with mass gaps are examples of hidden valleys		0801.0629
8	S. Knapen, S. Pagan Griso, M. Papucci, and D. J. Robinson	Triggering soft bombs at the LHC	JHEP 08 (2017) 076	1612.00850
9	G. Elor, N. L. Rodd, and T. R. Slatyer	Multistep cascade annihilations of dark matter and the galactic center excess	PRD 91 (2015) 103531	1503.01773
10	CMS Collaboration	Search for microscopic black hole signatures at the Large Hadron Collider	PLB 697 (2011) 434	CMS-EXO-10-017 1012.3375
11	S. C. Park	Black holes and the LHC: A review	Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 67 (2012) 617	1203.4683
12	A. Costantino, S. Fichet, and P. Tanedo	Effective field theory in AdS: Continuum regime, soft bombs, and IR emergence	PRD 102 (2020) 115038	2002.12335
13	S. Amoroso, D. Kar, and M. Schott	How to discover QCD instantons at the LHC	EPJC 81 (2021) 624	2012.09120
14	CMS Collaboration	HEPData record for this analysis	link
15	P. Schwaller, D. Stolarski, and A. Weiler	Emerging jets	JHEP 05 (2015) 059	1502.05409
16	CMS Collaboration	Search for new physics with emerging jets in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV	Submitted to \emphJHEP, 2024	CMS-EXO-22-015 2403.01556
17	T. Cohen, M. Lisanti, and H. K. Lou	Semivisible jets: Dark matter undercover at the LHC	PRL 115 (2015) 171804	1503.00009
18	CMS Collaboration	Search for resonant production of strongly coupled dark matter in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV	JHEP 06 (2022) 156	CMS-EXO-19-020 2112.11125
19	M. Graham, C. Hearty, and M. Williams	Searches for dark photons at accelerators	Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 71 (2021) 37	2104.10280
20	S. Knapen, J. Shelton, and D. Xu	Perturbative benchmark models for a dark shower search program	PRD 103 (2021) 115013	2103.01238
21	J. Alwall et al.	The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations	JHEP 07 (2014) 079	1405.0301
22	T. Sjöstrand et al.	An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2	Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159	1410.3012
23	CMS Collaboration	Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements	EPJC 80 (2020) 4	CMS-GEN-17-001 1903.12179
24	NNPDF Collaboration	Parton distributions from high-precision collider data	EPJC 77 (2017) 663	1706.00428
25	GEANT4 Collaboration	GEANT4---a simulation toolkit	NIM A 506 (2003) 250
26	J. Barron et al.	Unsupervised hadronic SUEP at the LHC	JHEP 12 (2021) 129	2107.12379
27	CMS Collaboration	The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC	JINST 3 (2008) S08004
28	CMS Collaboration	Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV	JINST 15 (2020) P10017	CMS-TRG-17-001 2006.10165
29	CMS Collaboration	The CMS trigger system	JINST 12 (2017) P01020	CMS-TRG-12-001 1609.02366
30	CMS Collaboration	Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC	JINST 16 (2021) P05014	CMS-EGM-17-001 2012.06888
31	CMS Collaboration	Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV	JINST 13 (2018) P06015	CMS-MUO-16-001 1804.04528
32	CMS Collaboration	Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker	JINST 9 (2014) P10009	CMS-TRK-11-001 1405.6569
33	CMS Collaboration	Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector	JINST 12 (2017) P10003	CMS-PRF-14-001 1706.04965
34	CMS Collaboration	Technical proposal for the Phase-II upgrade of the Compact Muon Solenoid	CMS Technical Proposal CERN-LHCC-2015-010, CMS-TDR-15-02, 2015 CDS
35	M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez	The anti-$ k_{\mathrm{T}} $ jet clustering algorithm	JHEP 04 (2008) 063	0802.1189
36	M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez	FastJet user manual	EPJC 72 (2012) 1896	1111.6097
37	CMS Collaboration	Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV	JINST 12 (2017) P02014	CMS-JME-13-004 1607.03663
38	C. Cesarotti, M. Reece, and M. J. Strassler	The efficacy of event isotropy as an event shape observable	JHEP 07 (2021) 215	2011.06599
39	S. Choi and H. Oh	Improved extrapolation methods of data-driven background estimations in high energy physics	EPJC 81 (2021) 643	1906.10831
40	CMS Collaboration	Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV in 2015 and 2016 at CMS	EPJC 81 (2021) 800	CMS-LUM-17-003 2104.01927
41	CMS Collaboration	CMS luminosity measurement for the 2017 data-taking period at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV	CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2018 CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004	CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004
42	CMS Collaboration	CMS luminosity measurement for the 2018 data-taking period at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV	CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2019 CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002	CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002
43	CMS Collaboration	Measurement of the primary Lund jet plane density in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV	Submitted to \emphJHEP, 2023	CMS-SMP-22-007 2312.16343
44	K. Becker et al.	Precise predictions for boosted Higgs production		2005.07762
45	T. Junk	Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics	NIM A 434 (1999) 435	hep-ex/9902006
46	A. L. Read	Presentation of search results: The $ \text{CL}_\text{s} $ technique	JPG 28 (2002) 2693
47	LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group	Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 4. Deciphering the nature of the Higgs sector	CERN Report CERN-2017-002-M, 2016 link	1610.07922