CMS-PAS-TOP-23-005

CMS-PAS-TOP-23-005
Measurement of the inclusive $ \mathrm{t\bar{t}} $ cross section in final states with one lepton and additional jets at 5.02 TeV with 2017 data
CMS Collaboration
11 April 2024

Abstract: A measurement of the top quark pair production cross section in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 5.02 TeV is presented. The data were collected in a low-energy and low-intensity LHC run in autumn 2017, and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 302 pb$^{-1}$. The measurement is performed using events with one electron or muon, and multiple jets. Events are classified based on the number of all reconstructed jets and of the b-tagged jets; the signal selection includes the usage of multivariate analysis techniques. The measured cross section is 61.4 $ \pm $ 1.6 (stat) $^{+2.7}_{-2.6}$ (syst) $\pm$ 1.2 (lumi) pb. A combination with the result in the dilepton channel based on the same data set results in a value of 61.2 $ ^{+1.6}_{-1.5} $ (stat) $^{+2.6}_{-2.3}$ (syst) $\pm$ 1.2 (lumi) pb, in agreement with the standard model prediction of 69.5 $ ^{+2.9}_{-3.1} $ pb (at next-to-next-to-leading-order in QCD).
Links: CDS record (PDF) ; Physics Briefing ; CADI line (restricted) ;

Figures & Tables	Summary	References	CMS Publications

Figures
png pdf	Figure 1: Ranking of the input variables of the random forest. Importance in the horizontal axis is computed as the mean of accumulation of the impurity decrease within each tree [51].
png pdf	Figure 2: Distributions for data and expected signal and background contributions of the most discriminating input variables used for the random forest training, $ \Delta R_\mathrm{med}(\mathrm{j,j')} $ (left) and $ \mathit{m}(\mathrm{u},\mathrm{u'}) $ (right), in the 3j1b category, before the maximum likelihood fit. The vertical error bars represent the statistical uncertainty in the data, and the shaded band the experimental uncertainty in the prediction (not including MC statistics). The lower panels show the data-to-prediction ratio. The first and last bins in each distribution include underflow and overflow events, respectively.
png pdf	Figure 2-a: Distributions for data and expected signal and background contributions of the most discriminating input variables used for the random forest training, $ \Delta R_\mathrm{med}(\mathrm{j,j')} $ (left) and $ \mathit{m}(\mathrm{u},\mathrm{u'}) $ (right), in the 3j1b category, before the maximum likelihood fit. The vertical error bars represent the statistical uncertainty in the data, and the shaded band the experimental uncertainty in the prediction (not including MC statistics). The lower panels show the data-to-prediction ratio. The first and last bins in each distribution include underflow and overflow events, respectively.
png pdf	Figure 2-b: Distributions for data and expected signal and background contributions of the most discriminating input variables used for the random forest training, $ \Delta R_\mathrm{med}(\mathrm{j,j')} $ (left) and $ \mathit{m}(\mathrm{u},\mathrm{u'}) $ (right), in the 3j1b category, before the maximum likelihood fit. The vertical error bars represent the statistical uncertainty in the data, and the shaded band the experimental uncertainty in the prediction (not including MC statistics). The lower panels show the data-to-prediction ratio. The first and last bins in each distribution include underflow and overflow events, respectively.
png pdf	Figure 3: Distributions for data and expected signal and background contributions of the MVA score for the $ e $+jets (left) and $ \mu $+jets (right) channels in the 3j1b category, before the maximum likelihood fit. The vertical error bars represent the statistical uncertainty in the data, and the shaded band the experimental uncertainty in the prediction (not including MC statistics). The lower panels show the data-to-prediction ratio. The first and last bins in each distribution include underflow and overflow events, respectively.
png	Figure 3-a: Distributions for data and expected signal and background contributions of the MVA score for the $ e $+jets (left) and $ \mu $+jets (right) channels in the 3j1b category, before the maximum likelihood fit. The vertical error bars represent the statistical uncertainty in the data, and the shaded band the experimental uncertainty in the prediction (not including MC statistics). The lower panels show the data-to-prediction ratio. The first and last bins in each distribution include underflow and overflow events, respectively.
png	Figure 3-b: Distributions for data and expected signal and background contributions of the MVA score for the $ e $+jets (left) and $ \mu $+jets (right) channels in the 3j1b category, before the maximum likelihood fit. The vertical error bars represent the statistical uncertainty in the data, and the shaded band the experimental uncertainty in the prediction (not including MC statistics). The lower panels show the data-to-prediction ratio. The first and last bins in each distribution include underflow and overflow events, respectively.
png pdf	Figure 4: Observed and predicted number of events in each of the eight categories of the signal region, before the maximum likelihood fit. The vertical error bars represent the statistical uncertainty in the data, and the shaded band the experimental and theoretical uncertainty in the prediction. The lower panels show the data-to-prediction ratio.
png pdf	Figure 5: Distributions for the $ e $+jets final state after the maximum likelihood fit: MVA score bins for the 3j1b category and $ \Delta R_\mathrm{med}(\mathrm{j,j')} $ bins for the other categories. The vertical error bars represent the statistical uncertainty in the data, and the shaded band the uncertainty in the prediction. All uncertainties considered in the analysis are included in the uncertainty band. The lower panels show the data-to-prediction ratio. The first and last bins in each distribution include underflow and overflow events, respectively.
png pdf	Figure 6: Distributions for the $ \mu $+jets final state after the maximum likelihood fit: MVA score bins for the 3j1b category and $ \Delta R_\mathrm{med}(\mathrm{j,j')} $ bins for the other categories. The vertical error bars represent the statistical uncertainty in the data, and the shaded band the uncertainty in the prediction. All uncertainties considered in the analysis are included in the uncertainty band. The lower panels show the data-to-prediction ratio. The first and last bins in each distribution include underflow and overflow events, respectively.
png pdf	Figure 9: Summary of the most recent measurements from the ATLAS [3] and CMS Collaborations using data collected at 5 TeV.

Tables
png pdf	Table 1: Summary of MC samples used to model the signal and background processes. The last column corresponds to the QCD or electroweak (EW) precision used to normalize the distributions provided by the generators. The predictions for $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $, $ t $ channel and $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{W} $ are calculated using the PDF4LHC prescription [31].
png pdf	Table 2: Summary of the variables used for the MVA training.

Summary

A measurement of the top quark pair production cross section in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 5.02 TeV is performed for events with one electron or one muon and multiple jets using data collected by the CMS experiment in 2017, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 302 pb$^{-1}$. The dominant background sources in the analysis are W+jets and tW processes for which MC simulations are used to estimate their contribution. In addition, the contribution from QCD multijet events is estimated from data. The measurement is done via a maximum likelihood fit to eight event categories defined in terms of the number of jets and b-tagged jets. The cross section is found to be 61.4 $ \pm $ 1.6 (stat) $ ^{+2.7}_{-2.6} $ (syst) $ \pm $ 1.2 (lumi) pb. This measurement is combined with the result obtained in the dilepton channel, based on the same data set, resulting in a value of 61.2 $ ^{+1.6}_{-1.5} $ (stat) $ ^{+2.6}_{-2.3} $ (syst) $ \pm $ 1.2 (lumi) pb. In both cases, the dominant uncertainties are those associated with the luminosity and with the b tagging scale factors for heavy flavours. This result is in agreement with the standard model prediction and with previous measurements from CMS and ATLAS. A summary plot of previous CMS and ATLAS measurements, together with the ones presented in this analysis (as well as those for the $ e $+jets and $ \mu $+jets channels separately) can be seen in Fig. 9.

References
1	CMS Collaboration	Measurement of the inclusive $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ cross section in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 5.02 TeV using final states with at least one charged lepton	JHEP 03 (2018) 115	CMS-TOP-16-023 1711.03143
2	CMS Collaboration	Measurement of the inclusive $ \mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}} $ production cross section in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 5.02 TeV	JHEP 04 (2022) 144	CMS-TOP-20-004 2112.09114
3	ATLAS Collaboration	Measurement of the $ t\overline{t} $ production cross-section in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 5.02 TeV with the ATLAS detector	JHEP 06 (2023) 138	2207.01354
4	CMS and ATLAS Collaborations	Combination of inclusive top-quark pair production cross-section measurements using ATLAS and CMS data at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 and 8 TeV	JHEP 07 (2023) 213	2205.13830
5	ATLAS Collaboration	Measurement of the $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ production cross-section and lepton differential distributions in $ e\mu $ dilepton events from pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector	EPJC 80 (2020) 528	1910.08819
6	CMS Collaboration	Measurement of the top quark pair production cross section in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV	PRL 116 (2016) 052002	CMS-TOP-15-003 1510.05302
7	CMS Collaboration	Measurement of the $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ production cross section using events in the $ \mathrm{e}\mu $ final state in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV	EPJC 77 (2017) 172	CMS-TOP-16-005 1611.04040
8	CMS Collaboration	Measurement of differential $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ production cross sections in the full kinematic range using lepton+jets events from proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV	PRD 104 (2021) 092013	CMS-TOP-20-001 2108.02803
9	LHCb Collaboration	Measurement of forward top pair production in the dilepton channel in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV	JHEP 08 (2018) 174	1803.05188
10	CMS Collaboration	First measurement of the top quark pair production cross section in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13.6 TeV	JHEP 08 (2023) 204	CMS-TOP-22-012 2303.10680
11	ATLAS Collaboration	Measurement of the $ \mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}} $ cross section and its ratio to the Z production cross section using pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13.6 TeV with the ATLAS detector	PLB 848 (2024) 138376	2308.09529
12	CMS Collaboration	Observation of top quark production in proton-nucleus collisions	PRL 119 (2017) 242001	CMS-HIN-17-002 1709.07411
13	CMS Collaboration	Evidence for top quark production in nucleus-nucleus collisions	PRL 125 (2020) 222001	CMS-HIN-19-001 2006.11110
14	CMS Collaboration	Measurement of double-differential cross sections for top quark pair production in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV and impact on parton distribution functions	EPJC 77 (2017) 459	CMS-TOP-14-013 1703.01630
15	CMS Collaboration	The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC	JINST 3 (2008) S08004
16	CMS Collaboration	Development of the CMS detector for the CERN LHC Run 3	Accepted by \itJINST	CMS-PRF-21-001 2309.05466
17	CMS Collaboration	The CMS trigger system	JINST 12 (2017) P01020	CMS-TRG-12-001 1609.02366
18	CMS Collaboration	Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV	JINST 15 (2020) P10017	CMS-TRG-17-001 2006.10165
19	GEANT4 Collaboration	GEANT 4---a simulation toolkit	NIM A 506 (2003) 250
20	S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari	Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method	JHEP 11 (2007) 070	0709.2092
21	S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re	A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX	JHEP 06 (2010) 043	1002.2581
22	S. Frixione, P. Nason, and G. Ridolfi	A positive-weight next-to-leading-order Monte Carlo for heavy flavor hadroproduction	JHEP 09 (2007) 126	0707.3088
23	T. Sjöstrand et al.	An introduction to PYTHIA8.2	Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159	1410.3012
24	CMS Collaboration	Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements	EPJC 80 (2020) 4	CMS-GEN-17-001 1903.12179
25	NNPDF Collaboration	Parton distributions from high-precision collider data	EPJC 77 (2017) 663	1706.00428
26	J. Alwall et al.	The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations	JHEP 07 (2014) 079	1405.0301
27	R. Frederix and S. Frixione	Merging meets matching in MC@NLO	JHEP 12 (2012) 061	1209.6215
28	M. Czakon and A. Mitov	TOP++: a program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders	Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 2930	1112.5675
29	M. Czakon, P. Fiedler, and A. Mitov	Total top quark pair production cross section at hadron colliders through O($ \alpha_\mathrm{S}^4 $)	PRL 110 (2013) 252004	1303.6254
30	Particle Data Group Collaboration	Review of Particle Physics	PTEP 2020 (2020) 083C01
31	M. Botje et al.	The PDF4LHC Working Group Interim Recommendations		1101.0538
32	A. D. Martin, W. J. Stirling, R. S. Thorne, and G. Watt	Parton distributions for the LHC	EPJC 63 (2009) 189	0901.0002
33	A. D. Martin, W. J. Stirling, R. S. Thorne, and G. Watt	Uncertainties on $ \alpha_{S} $ in global PDF analyses and implications for predicted hadronic cross sections	EPJC 64 (2009) 653	0905.3531
34	H.-L. Lai et al.	New parton distributions for collider physics	PRD 82 (2010) 074024	1007.2241
35	J. Gao et al.	CT10 next-to-next-to-leading order global analysis of QCD	PRD 89 (2014) 033009	1302.6246
36	R. D. Ball et al.	Parton distributions with LHC data	Nuclear Physics B 867 (2013) 244	1207.1303
37	J. Campbell, T. Neumann, and Z. Sullivan	Single-top-quark production in the $ t $-channel at NNLO	JHEP 02 (2021) 040	2012.01574
38	N. Kidonakis and N. Yamanaka	Higher-order corrections for $ tW $ production at high-energy hadron colliders	JHEP 05 (2021) 278	2102.11300
39	K. Melnikov and F. Petriello	Electroweak gauge boson production at hadron colliders through $ O(\alpha_\mathrm{S}^2) $	PRD 74 (2006) 114017	hep-ph/0609070
40	CMS Collaboration	Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector	JINST 12 (2017) P10003	CMS-PRF-14-001 1706.04965
41	M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez	The anti-$ k_{\mathrm{T}} $ jet clustering algorithm	JHEP 04 (2008) 063	0802.1189
42	M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez	FASTJET user manual	EPJC 72 (2012) 1896	1111.6097
43	CMS Collaboration	Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV	JINST 12 (2017) P02014	CMS-JME-13-004 1607.03663
44	CMS Collaboration	Jet algorithms performance in 13 TeV data	CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2017 CMS-PAS-JME-16-003	CMS-PAS-JME-16-003
45	CMS Collaboration	Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV	JINST 13 (2018) P05011	CMS-BTV-16-002 1712.07158
46	CMS Collaboration	Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC	JINST 16 (2021) P05014	CMS-EGM-17-001 2012.06888
47	CMS Collaboration	Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV	JINST 13 (2018) P06015	CMS-MUO-16-001 1804.04528
48	CMS Collaboration	Technical proposal for the Phase-II upgrade of the Compact Muon Solenoid	CMS Technical Proposal CERN-LHCC-2015-010, CMS-TDR-15-02, 2015 CDS
49	CMS Collaboration	Measurement of the Higgs boson production rate in association with top quarks in final states with electrons, muons, and hadronically decaying tau leptons at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV	EPJC 81 (2021) 378	CMS-HIG-19-008 2011.03652
50	CMS Collaboration	Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV using the CMS detector	JINST 14 (2019) P07004	CMS-JME-17-001 1903.06078
51	F. Pedregosa et al.	Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python	Journal of Machine Learning Research 12 (2011) 2825
52	J. Butterworth et al.	PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II	JPG 43 (2016) 023001	1510.03865
53	CMS Collaboration	Luminosity calibration for the pp reference run at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 5.02 TeV in 2017	CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2019 CMS-PAS-LUM-19-001	CMS-PAS-LUM-19-001
54	J. S. Conway	Incorporating nuisance parameters in likelihoods for multisource spectra	in Proc. 2011 Workshop on Statistical Issues Related to Discovery Claims in Search Experiments and Unfolding (PHYSTAT ): Geneva, 2011 link	1103.0354