CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-EXO-21-013 ; CERN-EP-2023-256
Search for long-lived heavy neutral leptons with lepton flavour conserving or violating decays to a jet and a charged lepton
JHEP 03 (2024) 105
Abstract: A search for long-lived heavy neutral leptons (HNLs) is presented, which considers the hadronic final state and coupling scenarios involving all three lepton generations in the 2--20 GeV HNL mass range for the first time. Events comprising two leptons (electrons or muons) and jets are analyzed in a data sample of proton-proton collisions, recorded with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$ ^{-1} $. A novel jet tagger, based on a deep neural network, has been developed to identify jets from an HNL decay using various features of the jet and its constituent particles. The network output can be used as a powerful discriminating tool to probe a broad range of HNL lifetimes and masses. Contributions from background processes are determined from data. No excess of events in data over the expected background is observed. Upper limits on the HNL production cross section are derived as functions of the HNL mass and the three coupling strengths $ V_{\ell\mathrm{N}} $ to each lepton generation $\ell$ and presented as exclusion limits in the coupling-mass plane, as lower limits on the HNL lifetime, and on the HNL mass. In this search, the most stringent limit on the coupling strength is obtained for pure muon coupling scenarios; values of $ |V_{\mu\mathrm{N}}|^{2} > $ 5 (4) $\times$ 10$^{-7} $ are excluded for Dirac (Majorana) HNLs with a mass of 10 GeV at a confidence level of 95% that correspond to proper decay lengths of 17 (10) mm.
Figures Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Born-level Feynman diagram for Dirac HNL production and decay via a charged-current interaction. Corresponding diagrams exist also for Dirac anti-HNL and Majorana HNL production and decay. In this search, the HNL decay products, encapsulated by the boxes, can be found collimated within a single jet $ \text{j}^{\star} $.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Distributions of $ m_{\ell\ell\text{j}^{\star}} $ for events with (left) OS leptons and (right) SS leptons in the signal region. A representative signal scenario for Majorana HNL production with equal coupling to all lepton generations is overlaid with its expected cross section scaled up as indicated in parentheses. The hatched band shows the total experimental systematic uncertainty in the simulated background prediction including the uncertainty from the finite sample size. The bottom panel shows the ratio of data over the prediction.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
Distributions of $ m_{\ell\ell\text{j}^{\star}} $ for events with (left) OS leptons and (right) SS leptons in the signal region. A representative signal scenario for Majorana HNL production with equal coupling to all lepton generations is overlaid with its expected cross section scaled up as indicated in parentheses. The hatched band shows the total experimental systematic uncertainty in the simulated background prediction including the uncertainty from the finite sample size. The bottom panel shows the ratio of data over the prediction.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
Distributions of $ m_{\ell\ell\text{j}^{\star}} $ for events with (left) OS leptons and (right) SS leptons in the signal region. A representative signal scenario for Majorana HNL production with equal coupling to all lepton generations is overlaid with its expected cross section scaled up as indicated in parentheses. The hatched band shows the total experimental systematic uncertainty in the simulated background prediction including the uncertainty from the finite sample size. The bottom panel shows the ratio of data over the prediction.

png pdf
Figure 3:
Distributions of the displaced jet tagging score for (left) resolved and (right) boosted categories: (upper row) control region; (middle row) signal region with OS leptons; (lower row) signal region with SS leptons. A representative signal scenario for Majorana HNL production with equal coupling to all lepton generations is overlaid with its expected cross section scaled up as indicated in parentheses. The hatched band shows the total experimental systematic uncertainty in the simulated background prediction including the uncertainty from the finite sample size. The bottom panel shows the ratio of data over the prediction.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
Distributions of the displaced jet tagging score for (left) resolved and (right) boosted categories: (upper row) control region; (middle row) signal region with OS leptons; (lower row) signal region with SS leptons. A representative signal scenario for Majorana HNL production with equal coupling to all lepton generations is overlaid with its expected cross section scaled up as indicated in parentheses. The hatched band shows the total experimental systematic uncertainty in the simulated background prediction including the uncertainty from the finite sample size. The bottom panel shows the ratio of data over the prediction.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
Distributions of the displaced jet tagging score for (left) resolved and (right) boosted categories: (upper row) control region; (middle row) signal region with OS leptons; (lower row) signal region with SS leptons. A representative signal scenario for Majorana HNL production with equal coupling to all lepton generations is overlaid with its expected cross section scaled up as indicated in parentheses. The hatched band shows the total experimental systematic uncertainty in the simulated background prediction including the uncertainty from the finite sample size. The bottom panel shows the ratio of data over the prediction.

png pdf
Figure 3-c:
Distributions of the displaced jet tagging score for (left) resolved and (right) boosted categories: (upper row) control region; (middle row) signal region with OS leptons; (lower row) signal region with SS leptons. A representative signal scenario for Majorana HNL production with equal coupling to all lepton generations is overlaid with its expected cross section scaled up as indicated in parentheses. The hatched band shows the total experimental systematic uncertainty in the simulated background prediction including the uncertainty from the finite sample size. The bottom panel shows the ratio of data over the prediction.

png pdf
Figure 3-d:
Distributions of the displaced jet tagging score for (left) resolved and (right) boosted categories: (upper row) control region; (middle row) signal region with OS leptons; (lower row) signal region with SS leptons. A representative signal scenario for Majorana HNL production with equal coupling to all lepton generations is overlaid with its expected cross section scaled up as indicated in parentheses. The hatched band shows the total experimental systematic uncertainty in the simulated background prediction including the uncertainty from the finite sample size. The bottom panel shows the ratio of data over the prediction.

png pdf
Figure 3-e:
Distributions of the displaced jet tagging score for (left) resolved and (right) boosted categories: (upper row) control region; (middle row) signal region with OS leptons; (lower row) signal region with SS leptons. A representative signal scenario for Majorana HNL production with equal coupling to all lepton generations is overlaid with its expected cross section scaled up as indicated in parentheses. The hatched band shows the total experimental systematic uncertainty in the simulated background prediction including the uncertainty from the finite sample size. The bottom panel shows the ratio of data over the prediction.

png pdf
Figure 3-f:
Distributions of the displaced jet tagging score for (left) resolved and (right) boosted categories: (upper row) control region; (middle row) signal region with OS leptons; (lower row) signal region with SS leptons. A representative signal scenario for Majorana HNL production with equal coupling to all lepton generations is overlaid with its expected cross section scaled up as indicated in parentheses. The hatched band shows the total experimental systematic uncertainty in the simulated background prediction including the uncertainty from the finite sample size. The bottom panel shows the ratio of data over the prediction.

png pdf
Figure 4:
Schematic of the orthogonal regions in the ($ m_{\ell\ell\text{j}^{\star}} $,$ P_{\mathrm{q},\ell}(j^{\star}) $) plane, that are used to determine the background in region D from data through an ABCD method. The threshold $ P_\text{opt.} $ depends on the category. Regions with $ P_{\mathrm{q},\ell}(j^{\star}) < $ 0.1 (0.2) for resolved (boosted) events are not considered. The three VRs that are subsets of regions A and C are indicated in lighter shades. The figure is not to scale.

png pdf
Figure 5:
Observed number of events and predicted number of background events per category for (left) resolved and (right) boosted categories. The bin label denotes the flavour of the prompt ($ \ell_{1} $) and displaced ($ \ell_{2} $) lepton as $ \ell_{1} \ell_{2} $. Two representative signal scenarios for Majorana HNL production with equal coupling to all lepton generations are overlaid. The lower panels show the ratio of the data to the predicted background. The hatched band shows the total systematic uncertainty in the predicted background.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
Observed number of events and predicted number of background events per category for (left) resolved and (right) boosted categories. The bin label denotes the flavour of the prompt ($ \ell_{1} $) and displaced ($ \ell_{2} $) lepton as $ \ell_{1} \ell_{2} $. Two representative signal scenarios for Majorana HNL production with equal coupling to all lepton generations are overlaid. The lower panels show the ratio of the data to the predicted background. The hatched band shows the total systematic uncertainty in the predicted background.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
Observed number of events and predicted number of background events per category for (left) resolved and (right) boosted categories. The bin label denotes the flavour of the prompt ($ \ell_{1} $) and displaced ($ \ell_{2} $) lepton as $ \ell_{1} \ell_{2} $. Two representative signal scenarios for Majorana HNL production with equal coupling to all lepton generations are overlaid. The lower panels show the ratio of the data to the predicted background. The hatched band shows the total systematic uncertainty in the predicted background.

png pdf
Figure 6:
Expected and observed 95% CL limits on (left) Majorana and (right) Dirac HNL production as functions of the HNL mass and coupling strengths for (upper row) pure electron, (middle row) pure muon, and (lower row) pure $ \tau $ lepton coupling scenarios. For the last coupling case no limits are derived for $ m_{\mathrm{N}} \lesssim $ 3 GeV because of the tau mass. The dashed-dotted line shows the result of an orthogonal CMS analysis targeting HNL decays to leptons.

png pdf
Figure 6-a:
Expected and observed 95% CL limits on (left) Majorana and (right) Dirac HNL production as functions of the HNL mass and coupling strengths for (upper row) pure electron, (middle row) pure muon, and (lower row) pure $ \tau $ lepton coupling scenarios. For the last coupling case no limits are derived for $ m_{\mathrm{N}} \lesssim $ 3 GeV because of the tau mass. The dashed-dotted line shows the result of an orthogonal CMS analysis targeting HNL decays to leptons.

png pdf
Figure 6-b:
Expected and observed 95% CL limits on (left) Majorana and (right) Dirac HNL production as functions of the HNL mass and coupling strengths for (upper row) pure electron, (middle row) pure muon, and (lower row) pure $ \tau $ lepton coupling scenarios. For the last coupling case no limits are derived for $ m_{\mathrm{N}} \lesssim $ 3 GeV because of the tau mass. The dashed-dotted line shows the result of an orthogonal CMS analysis targeting HNL decays to leptons.

png pdf
Figure 6-c:
Expected and observed 95% CL limits on (left) Majorana and (right) Dirac HNL production as functions of the HNL mass and coupling strengths for (upper row) pure electron, (middle row) pure muon, and (lower row) pure $ \tau $ lepton coupling scenarios. For the last coupling case no limits are derived for $ m_{\mathrm{N}} \lesssim $ 3 GeV because of the tau mass. The dashed-dotted line shows the result of an orthogonal CMS analysis targeting HNL decays to leptons.

png pdf
Figure 6-d:
Expected and observed 95% CL limits on (left) Majorana and (right) Dirac HNL production as functions of the HNL mass and coupling strengths for (upper row) pure electron, (middle row) pure muon, and (lower row) pure $ \tau $ lepton coupling scenarios. For the last coupling case no limits are derived for $ m_{\mathrm{N}} \lesssim $ 3 GeV because of the tau mass. The dashed-dotted line shows the result of an orthogonal CMS analysis targeting HNL decays to leptons.

png pdf
Figure 6-e:
Expected and observed 95% CL limits on (left) Majorana and (right) Dirac HNL production as functions of the HNL mass and coupling strengths for (upper row) pure electron, (middle row) pure muon, and (lower row) pure $ \tau $ lepton coupling scenarios. For the last coupling case no limits are derived for $ m_{\mathrm{N}} \lesssim $ 3 GeV because of the tau mass. The dashed-dotted line shows the result of an orthogonal CMS analysis targeting HNL decays to leptons.

png pdf
Figure 6-f:
Expected and observed 95% CL limits on (left) Majorana and (right) Dirac HNL production as functions of the HNL mass and coupling strengths for (upper row) pure electron, (middle row) pure muon, and (lower row) pure $ \tau $ lepton coupling scenarios. For the last coupling case no limits are derived for $ m_{\mathrm{N}} \lesssim $ 3 GeV because of the tau mass. The dashed-dotted line shows the result of an orthogonal CMS analysis targeting HNL decays to leptons.

png pdf
Figure 7:
Expected and observed 95% CL limits on (left) Majorana and (right) Dirac HNL production for various coupling scenarios as functions of the HNL mass and coupling strengths: (upper row) mixed e-$\mu $ couplings; (middle row) mixed e-$\tau $ couplings; (lower row) mixed $ \mu$-$\tau $ couplings. The relative ratios of the coupling per lepton generation are indicated in the plots.

png pdf
Figure 7-a:
Expected and observed 95% CL limits on (left) Majorana and (right) Dirac HNL production for various coupling scenarios as functions of the HNL mass and coupling strengths: (upper row) mixed e-$\mu $ couplings; (middle row) mixed e-$\tau $ couplings; (lower row) mixed $ \mu$-$\tau $ couplings. The relative ratios of the coupling per lepton generation are indicated in the plots.

png pdf
Figure 7-b:
Expected and observed 95% CL limits on (left) Majorana and (right) Dirac HNL production for various coupling scenarios as functions of the HNL mass and coupling strengths: (upper row) mixed e-$\mu $ couplings; (middle row) mixed e-$\tau $ couplings; (lower row) mixed $ \mu$-$\tau $ couplings. The relative ratios of the coupling per lepton generation are indicated in the plots.

png pdf
Figure 7-c:
Expected and observed 95% CL limits on (left) Majorana and (right) Dirac HNL production for various coupling scenarios as functions of the HNL mass and coupling strengths: (upper row) mixed e-$\mu $ couplings; (middle row) mixed e-$\tau $ couplings; (lower row) mixed $ \mu$-$\tau $ couplings. The relative ratios of the coupling per lepton generation are indicated in the plots.

png pdf
Figure 7-d:
Expected and observed 95% CL limits on (left) Majorana and (right) Dirac HNL production for various coupling scenarios as functions of the HNL mass and coupling strengths: (upper row) mixed e-$\mu $ couplings; (middle row) mixed e-$\tau $ couplings; (lower row) mixed $ \mu$-$\tau $ couplings. The relative ratios of the coupling per lepton generation are indicated in the plots.

png pdf
Figure 7-e:
Expected and observed 95% CL limits on (left) Majorana and (right) Dirac HNL production for various coupling scenarios as functions of the HNL mass and coupling strengths: (upper row) mixed e-$\mu $ couplings; (middle row) mixed e-$\tau $ couplings; (lower row) mixed $ \mu$-$\tau $ couplings. The relative ratios of the coupling per lepton generation are indicated in the plots.

png pdf
Figure 7-f:
Expected and observed 95% CL limits on (left) Majorana and (right) Dirac HNL production for various coupling scenarios as functions of the HNL mass and coupling strengths: (upper row) mixed e-$\mu $ couplings; (middle row) mixed e-$\tau $ couplings; (lower row) mixed $ \mu$-$\tau $ couplings. The relative ratios of the coupling per lepton generation are indicated in the plots.

png pdf
Figure 8:
Expected and observed 95% CL limits on (left) Majorana and (right) Dirac HNL production for the democratic couplings to all lepton generation scenario as functions of the HNL mass and coupling strengths.

png pdf
Figure 8-a:
Expected and observed 95% CL limits on (left) Majorana and (right) Dirac HNL production for the democratic couplings to all lepton generation scenario as functions of the HNL mass and coupling strengths.

png pdf
Figure 8-b:
Expected and observed 95% CL limits on (left) Majorana and (right) Dirac HNL production for the democratic couplings to all lepton generation scenario as functions of the HNL mass and coupling strengths.

png pdf
Figure 9:
Observed 95% CL lower limits on the (left column) Majorana and (right column) Dirac HNL mass as functions of the relative couplings to the three lepton generations considering a fixed proper decay length of (upper row) 0.1 mm and (lower row) 1 mm. The limits are determined for $ m_{\mathrm{N}} > $ 3 GeV.

png pdf
Figure 9-a:
Observed 95% CL lower limits on the (left column) Majorana and (right column) Dirac HNL mass as functions of the relative couplings to the three lepton generations considering a fixed proper decay length of (upper row) 0.1 mm and (lower row) 1 mm. The limits are determined for $ m_{\mathrm{N}} > $ 3 GeV.

png pdf
Figure 9-b:
Observed 95% CL lower limits on the (left column) Majorana and (right column) Dirac HNL mass as functions of the relative couplings to the three lepton generations considering a fixed proper decay length of (upper row) 0.1 mm and (lower row) 1 mm. The limits are determined for $ m_{\mathrm{N}} > $ 3 GeV.

png pdf
Figure 9-c:
Observed 95% CL lower limits on the (left column) Majorana and (right column) Dirac HNL mass as functions of the relative couplings to the three lepton generations considering a fixed proper decay length of (upper row) 0.1 mm and (lower row) 1 mm. The limits are determined for $ m_{\mathrm{N}} > $ 3 GeV.

png pdf
Figure 9-d:
Observed 95% CL lower limits on the (left column) Majorana and (right column) Dirac HNL mass as functions of the relative couplings to the three lepton generations considering a fixed proper decay length of (upper row) 0.1 mm and (lower row) 1 mm. The limits are determined for $ m_{\mathrm{N}} > $ 3 GeV.

png pdf
Figure 10:
Observed 95% CL lower limits on the (left column) Majorana and (right column) Dirac HNL proper decay length as functions of the relative couplings to the three lepton generations considering a fixed mass of (upper row) 4.5 GeV and (lower row) 8.0 GeV.

png pdf
Figure 10-a:
Observed 95% CL lower limits on the (left column) Majorana and (right column) Dirac HNL proper decay length as functions of the relative couplings to the three lepton generations considering a fixed mass of (upper row) 4.5 GeV and (lower row) 8.0 GeV.

png pdf
Figure 10-b:
Observed 95% CL lower limits on the (left column) Majorana and (right column) Dirac HNL proper decay length as functions of the relative couplings to the three lepton generations considering a fixed mass of (upper row) 4.5 GeV and (lower row) 8.0 GeV.

png pdf
Figure 10-c:
Observed 95% CL lower limits on the (left column) Majorana and (right column) Dirac HNL proper decay length as functions of the relative couplings to the three lepton generations considering a fixed mass of (upper row) 4.5 GeV and (lower row) 8.0 GeV.

png pdf
Figure 10-d:
Observed 95% CL lower limits on the (left column) Majorana and (right column) Dirac HNL proper decay length as functions of the relative couplings to the three lepton generations considering a fixed mass of (upper row) 4.5 GeV and (lower row) 8.0 GeV.
Summary
A search is presented for long-lived heavy neutral leptons (HNLs), which are predicted in extensions of the standard model of particle physics through a seesaw mechanism. Dirac or Majorana HNLs can mix with the three standard model lepton generations in a nontrivial way, resulting in lepton flavour number violation. Hence, a complete set of coupling scenarios involving all three lepton generations is considered. A novelty of this analysis is the simultaneous sensitivity to prompt and displaced scenarios through the use of a dedicated displaced jet tagger that does not explicitly rely on the presence of secondary vertices. A data sample of proton-proton collision events recorded with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV is analyzed, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$ ^{-1} $. Events containing two leptons (electrons or muons) and jets are selected and categorized according to the lepton flavour and electrical charge, the displacement of the lower-momentum lepton, and whether the lepton overlaps with a nearby jet. Jets originating from the decay of a long-lived HNL are identified through a deep neural network using various features of the jet and its constituent particles. The network training relies on simulated event samples that cover a broad range of HNL masses and lifetimes, and acts as a powerful discriminant for jets that are spatially separated from the luminous region, even in the absence of reconstructed secondary vertices. Contributions from background processes are determined from data in sideband regions. No excess of events in the data over the expected background is observed. Upper limits on the HNL production cross section are determined as functions of the HNL mass and the three coupling strengths to each lepton generation. Exclusion limits are presented in the coupling-mass plane, as lower limits on the HNL lifetime, and on the HNL mass. Results are provided for Dirac and Majorana HNL production considering various coupling combinations. The most stringent limit on the coupling strength is obtained for pure muon coupling scenarios, with values of $ |V_{\mu\mathrm{N}}|^{2} > $ 5 (4) $\times$ 10$^{-7} $ excluded for Dirac (Majorana) HNLs with a mass of 10 GeV at a confidence level of 95% that correspond to proper decay lengths of 17 (10) mm. This analysis is the first HNL search at the LHC that targets long-lived and hadronically decaying HNLs in the 2-20 GeV mass range, with inclusive coupling to all three lepton generations. The results show comparable sensitivity to an orthogonal analysis that targets long-lived HNLs decaying to leptons.
References
1 Super-Kamiokande Collaboration Evidence for oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos PRL 81 (1998) 1562 hep-ex/9807003
2 SNO Collaboration Direct evidence for neutrino flavor transformation from neutral current interactions in the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory PRL 89 (2002) 011301 nucl-ex/0204008
3 I. Esteban et al. Global analysis of three-flavour neutrino oscillations: synergies and tensions in the determination of $ \theta_{23} $, $ \delta_{CP} $, and the mass ordering JHEP 01 (2019) 106 1811.05487
4 KATRIN Collaboration Direct neutrino-mass measurement with sub-electronvolt sensitivity Nature Phys. 18 (2022) 160 2105.08533
5 Particle Data Group Review of particle physics Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022 (2022) 083C01
6 P. Minkowski $ \mu \to \mathrm{e} \gamma $ at a rate of one out of 1-billion muon decays? PLB 67 (1977) 421
7 M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond, and R. Slansky Complex spinors and unified theories in Supergravity: proceedings of the Supergravity Workshop at Stony Brook, . North-Holland, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1979
link
8 T. Yanagida Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos in Proceedings of the Workshop on the Unified Theory and the Baryon Number in the Universe, . National Laboratory for High Energy Physics (KEK), 1979
9 R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovi\ifmmode \acute c \else \'c \fi Neutrino mass and spontaneous parity violation PRL 44 (1980) 912
10 J. Schechter and J. W. F. Valle Neutrino masses in SU(2) \ensuremath\bigotimes U(1) theories PRD 22 (1980) 2227
11 R. Foot, H. Lew, X.-G. He, and G. C. Joshi See-saw neutrino masses induced by a triplet of leptons Z. Phys. C 44 (1989) 441
12 K. Bondarenko, A. Boyarsky, D. Gorbunov, and O. Ruchayskiy Phenomenology of GeVns-scale heavy neutral leptons JHEP 11 (2018) 032 1805.08567
13 T. Asaka and M. Shaposhnikov The $ \nu $MSM, dark matter and baryon asymmetry of the universe PLB 620 (2005) 17 hep-ph/0505013
14 T. Asaka, S. Blanchet, and M. Shaposhnikov The nuMSM, dark matter and neutrino masses PLB 631 (2005) 151 hep-ph/0503065
15 A. Boyarsky, O. Ruchayskiy, and M. Shaposhnikov The role of sterile neutrinos in cosmology and astrophysics Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 59 (2009) 191 0901.0011
16 M. Drewes The phenomenology of right handed neutrinos Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 22 (2013) 1330019 1303.6912
17 F. F. Deppisch, P. S. Bhupal Dev, and A. Pilaftsis Neutrinos and collider physics New J. Phys. 17 (2015) 075019 1502.06541
18 J. Beacham et al. Physics beyond colliders at CERN: beyond the standard model working group report JPG 47 (2020) 010501 1901.09966
19 ATLAS Collaboration Search for heavy neutral leptons in decays of W bosons produced in 13 TeV pp collisions using prompt and displaced signatures with the ATLAS detector JHEP 10 (2019) 265 1905.09787
20 ATLAS Collaboration Search for heavy neutral leptons in decays of W bosons using a dilepton displaced vertex in $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector PRL 131 (2023) 061803 2204.11988
21 CMS Collaboration Search for heavy neutral leptons in events with three charged leptons in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV PRL 120 (2018) 221801 CMS-EXO-17-012
1802.02965
22 CMS Collaboration Search for heavy Majorana neutrinos in same-sign dilepton channels in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 01 (2019) 122 CMS-EXO-17-028
1806.10905
23 CMS Collaboration Search for long-lived heavy neutral leptons with displaced vertices in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JHEP 07 (2022) 081 CMS-EXO-20-009
2201.05578
24 LHCb Collaboration Search for heavy neutral leptons in $ \mathrm{W^+} \to \mu^{+} \mu^\pm \text{jet} $ decays EPJC 81 (2021) 248 2011.05263
25 LHCb Collaboration Search for long-lived particles decaying to $ \mathrm{e}^\pm \mu^{\mp} \nu $ EPJC 81 (2021) 261 2012.02696
26 M. Chrzaszcz et al. A frequentist analysis of three right-handed neutrinos with GAMBIT EPJC 80 (2020) 569 1908.02302
27 CMS Collaboration HEPData record for this analysis link
28 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004
29 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
30 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ k_{\mathrm{T}} $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
31 CMS Collaboration Technical proposal for the Phase-II upgrade of the Compact Muon Solenoid CMS Technical Proposal CERN-LHCC-2015-010, CMS-TDR-15-02, 2015
CDS
32 CMS Collaboration Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV using the CMS detector JINST 14 (2019) P07004 CMS-JME-17-001
1903.06078
33 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JINST 15 (2020) P10017 CMS-TRG-17-001
2006.10165
34 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
35 CMS Collaboration Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 16 (2021) P05014 CMS-EGM-17-001
2012.06888
36 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS muon trigger system in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JINST 16 (2021) P07001 CMS-MUO-19-001
2102.04790
37 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
38 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions from high-precision collider data EPJC 77 (2017) 663 1706.00428
39 T. Sjöstrand et al. An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
40 CMS Collaboration Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements EPJC 76 (2016) 155 CMS-GEN-14-001
1512.00815
41 CMS Collaboration Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements EPJC 80 (2020) 4 CMS-GEN-17-001
1903.12179
42 O. Mattelaer On the maximal use of Monte Carlo samples: re-weighting events at NLO accuracy EPJC 76 (2016) 674 1607.00763
43 A. Atre, T. Han, S. Pascoli, and B. Zhang The search for heavy Majorana neutrinos JHEP 05 (2009) 030 0901.3589
44 D. Alva, T. Han, and R. Ruiz Heavy Majorana neutrinos from $ \mathrm{W}\gamma $ fusion at hadron colliders JHEP 02 (2015) 072 1411.7305
45 C. Degrande, O. Mattelaer, R. Ruiz, and J. Turner Fully-automated precision predictions for heavy neutrino production mechanisms at hadron colliders PRD 94 (2016) 053002 1602.06957
46 S. Pascoli, R. Ruiz, and C. Weiland Heavy neutrinos with dynamic jet vetoes: multilepton searches at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 14, 27, and 100 TeV JHEP 06 (2019) 049 1812.08750
47 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and G. Ridolfi A positive-weight next-to-leading-order Monte Carlo for heavy flavour hadroproduction JHEP 09 (2007) 126 0707.3088
48 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
49 R. Frederix, E. Re, and P. Torrielli Single-top t-channel hadroproduction in the four-flavour scheme with POWHEG and aMC@NLO JHEP 09 (2012) 130 1207.5391
50 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT 4---a simulation toolkit NIM A 506 (2003) 250
51 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P06015 CMS-MUO-16-001
1804.04528
52 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV JINST 12 (2017) P02014 CMS-JME-13-004
1607.03663
53 CMS Collaboration Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker JINST 9 (2014) P10009 CMS-TRK-11-001
1405.6569
54 CMS Collaboration A deep neural network to search for new long-lived particles decaying to jets Mach. Learn.:, 2020
Sci. Technol. 1 (2020) 035012
CMS-EXO-19-011
1912.12238
55 CMS Collaboration Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P05011 CMS-BTV-16-002
1712.07158
56 J. Thaler and K. Van Tilburg Identifying boosted objects with N-subjettiness JHEP 03 (2011) 015 1011.2268
57 D. Bertolini, P. Harris, M. Low, and N. Tran Pileup per particle identification JHEP 10 (2014) 059 1407.6013
58 CMS Collaboration Measurement of $ {\mathrm{B}}\overline{\mathrm{B}} $ angular correlations based on secondary vertex reconstruction at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV JHEP 03 (2011) 136 CMS-BPH-10-010
1102.3194
59 W. Adam, R. Fruehwirth, A. Strandlie, and T. Todorov Reconstruction of electrons with the Gaussian-sum filter in the CMS tracker at the LHC JPG 31 (2005) N9 physics/0306087
60 P. Baldi et al. Parameterized neural networks for high-energy physics EPJC 76 (2016) 235 1601.07913
61 Y. Ganin and V. Lempitsky Unsupervised domain adaptation by backpropagation 1409.7495
62 M. Arjovsky, S. Chintala, and L. Bottou Wasserstein GAN 1701.07875
63 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 07 (2018) 161 CMS-FSQ-15-005
1802.02613
64 A. Kalogeropoulos and J. Alwall The syscalc code: a tool to derive theoretical systematic uncertainties 1801.08401
65 CMS Collaboration Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV in 2015 and 2016 at CMS EPJC 81 (2021) 800 CMS-LUM-17-003
2104.01927
66 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurement for the 2017 data-taking period at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV Physics Analysis Summary, 2018
CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004
CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004
67 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurement for the 2018 data-taking period at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV Physics Analysis Summary, 2019
CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002
CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002
68 R. J. Barlow and C. Beeston Fitting using finite Monte Carlo samples Comput. Phys. Commun. 77 (1993) 219
69 G. Cowan Discovery sensitivity for a counting experiment with background uncertainty Technical Report, . Royal Holloway, London, U.K., 2012
link
70 ATLAS and CMS Collaborations, and LHC Higgs Combination Group Procedure for the LHC Higgs boson search combination in summer 2011 Technical Report CMS-NOTE-2011-005, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2011-11, 2011
71 T. Junk Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics Nucl. Instr. Meth. A 434 (1999) 435 hep-ex/9902006
72 A. L. Read Presentation of search results: the $ \text{CL}_\text{s} $ technique JPG 28 (2002) 2693
73 G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics EPJC 71 (2011) 1554 1007.1727
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN