CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-EXO-19-017 ; CERN-EP-2021-142
Search for new physics in the lepton plus missing transverse momentum final state in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV
JHEP 07 (2022) 067
Abstract: A search for physics beyond the standard model (SM) in final states with an electron or muon and missing transverse momentum is presented. The analysis uses data from proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV, collected with the CMS detector at the LHC in 2016-2018 and corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$. No significant deviation from the SM prediction is observed. Model-independent limits are set on the production cross section of W' bosons decaying into lepton-plus-neutrino final states. Within the framework of the sequential standard model, with the combined results from the electron and muon decay channels a W' boson with mass less than 5.7 TeV is excluded at 95% confidence level. Results on a SM precision test, the determination of the oblique electroweak $W$ parameter, are presented using LHC data for the first time. These results together with those from the direct W' resonance search are used to extend existing constraints on composite Higgs scenarios. This is the first experimental exclusion on compositeness parameters using results from LHC data other than Higgs boson measurements.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Feynman diagram for the production and decay of a new heavy boson, an SSM W' or a Kaluza-Klein excitation mode of W ($\mathrm{W} _{\mathrm {KK}}$) (left). The coupling strength, $g_{\mathrm{W'}}$, is allowed to vary. In RPV SUSY, a $\tau$ slepton ($\tilde{\tau}$) could also act as a mediator (right) with the corresponding coupling strength, ${\lambda}$, for the decay. This coupling strength is allowed to be different between the two final states, denoted by $ {\lambda} _{231}$ and $ {\lambda} _{132}$ for the electron and muon final states, respectively. Here, C.C. stands for charge conjugation.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Product of acceptance and efficiency for the SSM W' signal, as a function of the W' mass, after all selection criteria are applied for the electron (filled purple markers) and the muon (open blue markers) channels.

png pdf
Figure 3:
The distributions for lepton ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ (left) and ${{p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^\text {miss}}$ (right) for the electron (upper) and muon (lower) channels after applying the full selection criteria, for the combined 2016-2018 data sets. Two signal distributions are presented, corresponding to SSM W' boson masses of 3.8 and 5.6 TeV. The lower panels show the ratios of data to the SM prediction, and the shaded bands represents the systematic uncertainty.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
The distributions for lepton ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ (left) and ${{p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^\text {miss}}$ (right) for the electron (upper) and muon (lower) channels after applying the full selection criteria, for the combined 2016-2018 data sets. Two signal distributions are presented, corresponding to SSM W' boson masses of 3.8 and 5.6 TeV. The lower panels show the ratios of data to the SM prediction, and the shaded bands represents the systematic uncertainty.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
The distributions for lepton ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ (left) and ${{p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^\text {miss}}$ (right) for the electron (upper) and muon (lower) channels after applying the full selection criteria, for the combined 2016-2018 data sets. Two signal distributions are presented, corresponding to SSM W' boson masses of 3.8 and 5.6 TeV. The lower panels show the ratios of data to the SM prediction, and the shaded bands represents the systematic uncertainty.

png pdf
Figure 3-c:
The distributions for lepton ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ (left) and ${{p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^\text {miss}}$ (right) for the electron (upper) and muon (lower) channels after applying the full selection criteria, for the combined 2016-2018 data sets. Two signal distributions are presented, corresponding to SSM W' boson masses of 3.8 and 5.6 TeV. The lower panels show the ratios of data to the SM prediction, and the shaded bands represents the systematic uncertainty.

png pdf
Figure 3-d:
The distributions for lepton ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ (left) and ${{p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^\text {miss}}$ (right) for the electron (upper) and muon (lower) channels after applying the full selection criteria, for the combined 2016-2018 data sets. Two signal distributions are presented, corresponding to SSM W' boson masses of 3.8 and 5.6 TeV. The lower panels show the ratios of data to the SM prediction, and the shaded bands represents the systematic uncertainty.

png pdf
Figure 4:
The distributions for ${M_\mathrm {T}}$ for the electron (left) and muon (right) channels after applying the full selection criteria, for the combined 2016-2018 data sets. Two signal distributions are presented, corresponding to SSM W' boson masses of 3.8 and 5.6 TeV. The lower panels show the ratios of data to the SM prediction, and the shaded bands represents the systematic uncertainty.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
The distributions for ${M_\mathrm {T}}$ for the electron (left) and muon (right) channels after applying the full selection criteria, for the combined 2016-2018 data sets. Two signal distributions are presented, corresponding to SSM W' boson masses of 3.8 and 5.6 TeV. The lower panels show the ratios of data to the SM prediction, and the shaded bands represents the systematic uncertainty.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
The distributions for ${M_\mathrm {T}}$ for the electron (left) and muon (right) channels after applying the full selection criteria, for the combined 2016-2018 data sets. Two signal distributions are presented, corresponding to SSM W' boson masses of 3.8 and 5.6 TeV. The lower panels show the ratios of data to the SM prediction, and the shaded bands represents the systematic uncertainty.

png pdf
Figure 5:
The observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) upper limits at 95% CL on $\sigma _{\mathrm{W'}}\mathcal {B}(\mathrm{W'} \to \ell \nu)$ for an SSM W' boson model, as a function of the W' boson mass, for the electron (upper left), muon (upper right) channels, and the combination of both channels (lower). The shaded bands represent the one and two standard deviation uncertainty bands for the expected limits. The theoretical predictions for the SSM at QCD NNLO precision are shown, with the narrow grey bands indicating the uncertainty associated with the choice of PDFs and ${\alpha _\mathrm {S}}$.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
The observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) upper limits at 95% CL on $\sigma _{\mathrm{W'}}\mathcal {B}(\mathrm{W'} \to \ell \nu)$ for an SSM W' boson model, as a function of the W' boson mass, for the electron (upper left), muon (upper right) channels, and the combination of both channels (lower). The shaded bands represent the one and two standard deviation uncertainty bands for the expected limits. The theoretical predictions for the SSM at QCD NNLO precision are shown, with the narrow grey bands indicating the uncertainty associated with the choice of PDFs and ${\alpha _\mathrm {S}}$.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
The observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) upper limits at 95% CL on $\sigma _{\mathrm{W'}}\mathcal {B}(\mathrm{W'} \to \ell \nu)$ for an SSM W' boson model, as a function of the W' boson mass, for the electron (upper left), muon (upper right) channels, and the combination of both channels (lower). The shaded bands represent the one and two standard deviation uncertainty bands for the expected limits. The theoretical predictions for the SSM at QCD NNLO precision are shown, with the narrow grey bands indicating the uncertainty associated with the choice of PDFs and ${\alpha _\mathrm {S}}$.

png pdf
Figure 5-c:
The observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) upper limits at 95% CL on $\sigma _{\mathrm{W'}}\mathcal {B}(\mathrm{W'} \to \ell \nu)$ for an SSM W' boson model, as a function of the W' boson mass, for the electron (upper left), muon (upper right) channels, and the combination of both channels (lower). The shaded bands represent the one and two standard deviation uncertainty bands for the expected limits. The theoretical predictions for the SSM at QCD NNLO precision are shown, with the narrow grey bands indicating the uncertainty associated with the choice of PDFs and ${\alpha _\mathrm {S}}$.

png pdf
Figure 6:
The 95% CL observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) model-independent cross section limits as functions of the $ {M_\mathrm {T}^\mathrm {min}} $ threshold. These are shown for the electron (upper left) and muon (upper right) channels and their combination (lower). The one and two standard deviation uncertainty bands for the expected limits are shown.

png pdf
Figure 6-a:
The 95% CL observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) model-independent cross section limits as functions of the $ {M_\mathrm {T}^\mathrm {min}} $ threshold. These are shown for the electron (upper left) and muon (upper right) channels and their combination (lower). The one and two standard deviation uncertainty bands for the expected limits are shown.

png pdf
Figure 6-b:
The 95% CL observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) model-independent cross section limits as functions of the $ {M_\mathrm {T}^\mathrm {min}} $ threshold. These are shown for the electron (upper left) and muon (upper right) channels and their combination (lower). The one and two standard deviation uncertainty bands for the expected limits are shown.

png pdf
Figure 6-c:
The 95% CL observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) model-independent cross section limits as functions of the $ {M_\mathrm {T}^\mathrm {min}} $ threshold. These are shown for the electron (upper left) and muon (upper right) channels and their combination (lower). The one and two standard deviation uncertainty bands for the expected limits are shown.

png pdf
Figure 7:
The observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) upper limits at 95% CL on the coupling strength ratio, $g_{\mathrm{W'}}/g_{\mathrm{W}}$ as functions of the mass of the W' boson. These are shown for the electron (left) and muon (right) channels. The one and two standard deviation uncertainty bands for the expected limits are shown. The area above the limit curve is excluded. The dotted line represents the case of SSM couplings, $g_{\mathrm{W'}}$, being equal to $g_{\mathrm{W}}$, the SM coupling.

png pdf
Figure 7-a:
The observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) upper limits at 95% CL on the coupling strength ratio, $g_{\mathrm{W'}}/g_{\mathrm{W}}$ as functions of the mass of the W' boson. These are shown for the electron (left) and muon (right) channels. The one and two standard deviation uncertainty bands for the expected limits are shown. The area above the limit curve is excluded. The dotted line represents the case of SSM couplings, $g_{\mathrm{W'}}$, being equal to $g_{\mathrm{W}}$, the SM coupling.

png pdf
Figure 7-b:
The observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) upper limits at 95% CL on the coupling strength ratio, $g_{\mathrm{W'}}/g_{\mathrm{W}}$ as functions of the mass of the W' boson. These are shown for the electron (left) and muon (right) channels. The one and two standard deviation uncertainty bands for the expected limits are shown. The area above the limit curve is excluded. The dotted line represents the case of SSM couplings, $g_{\mathrm{W'}}$, being equal to $g_{\mathrm{W}}$, the SM coupling.

png pdf
Figure 8:
Exclusion limits in the 2D plane (1/$R$,$\mu $) for the split-UED interpretation for the $n = $ 2 case. These are shown for the electron (upper left), muon (upper right), and the combination of both (lower) channels for the 2016-2018 data sets. The expected limit is depicted as a black dashed line. The one and two standard deviation uncertainty bands for the expected limits are shown. The experimentally excluded region is the entire area to the left of the solid black line.

png pdf
Figure 8-a:
Exclusion limits in the 2D plane (1/$R$,$\mu $) for the split-UED interpretation for the $n = $ 2 case. These are shown for the electron (upper left), muon (upper right), and the combination of both (lower) channels for the 2016-2018 data sets. The expected limit is depicted as a black dashed line. The one and two standard deviation uncertainty bands for the expected limits are shown. The experimentally excluded region is the entire area to the left of the solid black line.

png pdf
Figure 8-b:
Exclusion limits in the 2D plane (1/$R$,$\mu $) for the split-UED interpretation for the $n = $ 2 case. These are shown for the electron (upper left), muon (upper right), and the combination of both (lower) channels for the 2016-2018 data sets. The expected limit is depicted as a black dashed line. The one and two standard deviation uncertainty bands for the expected limits are shown. The experimentally excluded region is the entire area to the left of the solid black line.

png pdf
Figure 8-c:
Exclusion limits in the 2D plane (1/$R$,$\mu $) for the split-UED interpretation for the $n = $ 2 case. These are shown for the electron (upper left), muon (upper right), and the combination of both (lower) channels for the 2016-2018 data sets. The expected limit is depicted as a black dashed line. The one and two standard deviation uncertainty bands for the expected limits are shown. The experimentally excluded region is the entire area to the left of the solid black line.

png pdf
Figure 9:
The observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) upper limits at 95% CL on the couplings $ {\lambda} _{231}$ (left) and $ {\lambda} _{132}$ (right), for several values of $ {\lambda '} _{3ij}$ ($i, j$ = 1, 2, 3), as a function of the mass of the mediator $\tilde{\tau}$ in the RPV SUSY model. The one and two standard deviation uncertainty bands for the expected limits are shown. The areas above the limit curves are excluded.

png pdf
Figure 9-a:
The observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) upper limits at 95% CL on the couplings $ {\lambda} _{231}$ (left) and $ {\lambda} _{132}$ (right), for several values of $ {\lambda '} _{3ij}$ ($i, j$ = 1, 2, 3), as a function of the mass of the mediator $\tilde{\tau}$ in the RPV SUSY model. The one and two standard deviation uncertainty bands for the expected limits are shown. The areas above the limit curves are excluded.

png pdf
Figure 9-b:
The observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) upper limits at 95% CL on the couplings $ {\lambda} _{231}$ (left) and $ {\lambda} _{132}$ (right), for several values of $ {\lambda '} _{3ij}$ ($i, j$ = 1, 2, 3), as a function of the mass of the mediator $\tilde{\tau}$ in the RPV SUSY model. The one and two standard deviation uncertainty bands for the expected limits are shown. The areas above the limit curves are excluded.

png pdf
Figure 10:
Region in the oblique $(W, Y)$ parameter phase space allowed by the current analysis at 95% CL, obtained by combining electron and muon channel distributions. Comparison of the result from the current analysis with the area derived from LEP experiments (grey-shaded area) is presented.

png pdf
Figure 11:
Regions in the $m_{*}$-$g_{*}$ plane excluded at 95% CL by the results derived in the framework of the different models considered in the current analysis. Constraints from the limit on the oblique $W$ parameter are shown in red. Constraints from the limit on the W' boson coupling strength are shown in light blue for the SSM W' hypothesis (only coupling to fermions), and in dark blue for the HVT W' hypothesis (coupling to bosons as well). In addition, the exclusion coming from current CMS constraints on the Higgs boson cross section is shown as a orange shaded area.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
The observed and expected number of events in the electron (upper) and muon (lower) channels, collected during three years (2016-2018), for selected values of ${M_\mathrm {T}}$ threshold. Predicted numbers of SSM W' events are given, for $M_{\mathrm{W'}}= $ 3.8 and 5.6 TeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are added in quadrature to provide the total uncertainty.

png pdf
Table 2:
Observed and expected lower limits at 95% CL on the SSM W' boson mass for the electron and muon channels and for the combination of the two.

png pdf
Table 3:
Summary of all 95% CL exclusion limit results with various theoretical model interpretations in the electron and muon channels, and the combination of both channels. The results in EFT and the composite Higgs boson model are obtained using 2017-2018 data sets only. The final allowed ranges for the model parameters are in the last column, except for the oblique $W$ parameter, where a measurement is provided, and the Composite Higgs scenario, as explained in the text.
Summary
A search for a deviation relative to standard model (SM) expectations in events with a final state consisting of a lepton (electron or muon) and missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV has been performed. The analysis strategy is similar to that of the previous study using data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 36 fb$^{-1}$ [19]. This search uses data collected by the CMS detector in 2016-2018 corresponding to 138 fb$^{-1}$ of total integrated luminosity. In addition to employing four times larger data set, this search considers two new interpretations.

No evidence for new physics is observed when examining the transverse mass distributions. These observations are interpreted as limits on the parameters of several models. The exclusion limits at 95% confidence level (CL) on the mass of a Sequential Standard Model (SSM) W' boson are found to be 5.4 and 5.6 TeV for the electron and muon channels, respectively. The 95% CL exclusion limit from the combination of both channels is 5.7 TeV. Variations in the coupling strength of the SSM W' boson are also examined. Models for which the ratio of the coupling strength of the W' boson to the SM W boson is at the level of 2$\times $10$^{-2}$ are excluded for W' masses up to 0.5 TeV. For higher masses the constraint on the coupling weakens, approaching $g_{\mathrm{W'}}/g_{\mathrm{W}} = $ 1 at the value of $M_{\mathrm{W'}}$ corresponding to the exclusion limit obtained in the SSM analysis. The result is also interpreted in the split universal extra dimensions model. The inverse radius of the extra dimension, 1/$R$, is constrained to be larger than 2.8 TeV if the bulk mass parameter of the five-dimensional fermion field, $\mu = $ 2 TeV.

Model-independent limits are also provided. These can be used to constrain parameters of several models through reinterpretations. As an example, the limits have been interpreted in the context of an $R$-parity violating supersymmetric model. This interpretation provides limits on the coupling strengths at the decay vertex as a function of the mediator $\tilde{\tau}$ mass, for various coupling values, $\lambda'_{3ij}$, at the production vertex.

In addition to these results, new interpretations of an ${\ell} \nu$ final state analysis using LHC data are considered for the first time. One is the measurement of the oblique $W$ parameter, using the combined electron and muon channels. The oblique $W$ parameter fitted value is $W = -$1.2$^{+0.5}_{-0.6}\times $10$^{-4}$, in agreement within uncertainties with the SM value. This is the most precise measurement to date of the oblique $W$ parameter, reducing its allowed range by more than an order of magnitude relative to previous bounds derived from LEP results.

Another new interpretation is made within the framework of composite Higgs boson models. The 95% CL exclusion limit for the combined channels is set in the $m_{*}$-$g_{*}$ plane, where $m_{*}$ indicates the mass scale of compositeness and $g_{*}$ the coupling strength of the new composite sector. In this case, interpretations of several of the presented results have been used in a complementary way, as different inputs for setting the limit. Each of the inputs is sensitive to a different region in the $m_{*}$-$g_{*}$ plane. Constraints coming from the limit on the W' coupling strength dominate the low-$m_{*}$ region and are kinematically limited by the collider energy. The high-$m_{*}$ region is probed by the indirect oblique $W$ parameter interpretation. Finally, we set a lower limit of 3 (1) TeV for the mass scale of such a composite Higgs boson, when an SSM (Heavy Vector Triplet) W' boson is assumed, extending existing constraints from previous measurements.
References
1 Particle Data Group, P. A. Zyla et al. Review of particle physics Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020 (2020) 083C01
2 R. N. Mohapatra and J. C. Pati ``Natural'' left-right symmetry PRD 11 (1975) 2558
3 R. N. Mohapatra and J. C. Pati Left-right gauge symmetry and an ``isoconjugate'' model of $ \mathrm{CP} $ violation PRD 11 (1975) 566
4 K. Hsieh, K. Schmitz, J.-H. Yu, and C.-P. Yuan Global analysis of general SU(2)$ \times $SU(2)$ \times $U(1) models with precision data PRD 82 (2010) 035011 1003.3482
5 N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, and G. Dvali The hierarchy problem and new dimensions at a millimeter PLB 429 (1998) 263 hep-ph/9803315
6 T. Appelquist, H.-C. Cheng, and B. A. Dobrescu Bounds on universal extra dimensions PRD 64 (2001) 035002 hep-ph/0012100
7 CMS Collaboration Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV using the CMS detector JINST 14 (2019) P07004 CMS-JME-17-001
1903.06078
8 G. Altarelli, B. Mele, and M. Ruiz-Altaba Searching for new heavy vector bosons in $ {\mathrm{p}}\mathrm{\bar{p}} $ colliders Z. Phys. C 45 (1989) 109, . [Erratum: \DOI10.1007/BF01552335]
9 K. Kong, S. C. Park, and T. G. Rizzo Collider phenomenology with split-UED JHEP 04 (2010) 081 1002.0602
10 C.-R. Chen et al. Dark matter and collider phenomenology of split-UED JHEP 09 (2009) 078 0903.1971
11 G. R. Farrar and P. Fayet Phenomenology of the production, decay, and detection of new hadronic states associated with supersymmetry PLB 76 (1978) 575
12 H. K. Dreiner and T. Stefaniak Bounds on R-parity violation from resonant slepton production at the LHC PRD 86 (2012) 055010 1201.5014
13 ATLAS Collaboration ATLAS search for a heavy gauge boson decaying to a charged lepton and a neutrino in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV EPJC 72 (2012) 2241 1209.4446
14 CMS Collaboration Search for leptonic decays of $ \mathrm{W'} $ bosons in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV JHEP 08 (2012) 023 CMS-EXO-11-024
1204.4764
15 ATLAS Collaboration Search for new particles in events with one lepton and missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 09 (2014) 037 1407.7494
16 CMS Collaboration Search for physics beyond the standard model in final states with a lepton and missing transverse energy in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV PRD 91 (2015) 092005 CMS-EXO-12-060
1408.2745
17 ATLAS Collaboration Search for a new heavy gauge boson resonance decaying into a lepton and missing transverse momentum in 36 fb$^{-1}$ of pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS experiment EPJC 78 (2018) 401 1706.04786
18 CMS Collaboration Search for heavy gauge $ \mathrm{W'} $ boson in events with an energetic lepton and large missing transverse momentum at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV PLB 770 (2017) 278 CMS-EXO-15-006
1612.09274
19 CMS Collaboration Search for high-mass resonances in final states with a lepton and missing transverse momentum at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 06 (2018) 128 CMS-EXO-16-033
1803.11133
20 ATLAS Collaboration Search for a heavy charged boson in events with a charged lepton and missing transverse momentum from pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector PRD 100 (2019) 052013 1906.05609
21 M. E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi Estimation of oblique electroweak corrections PRD 46 (1992) 381
22 A. Falkowski and K. Mimouni Model independent constraints on four-lepton operators JHEP 02 (2016) 086 1511.07434
23 ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, and OPAL Collaborations, and the LEP Electroweak Working Group Electroweak measurements in electron-positron collisions at $ \mathrm{W} $-boson-pair energies at LEP PR 532 (2013) 119 1302.3415
24 G. F. Giudice, C. Grojean, A. Pomarol, and R. Rattazzi The strongly-interacting light Higgs JHEP 06 (2007) 045 hep-ph/0703164
25 A. Thamm, R. Torre, and A. Wulzer Future tests of Higgs compositeness: direct vs indirect JHEP 07 (2015) 100 1502.01701
26 CMS Collaboration Combined measurements of higgs boson couplings in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV EPJC 79 (2019) 421 CMS-HIG-17-031
1809.10733
27 CMS Collaboration HEPData record for this analysis link
28 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JINST 15 (2020) P10017 CMS-TRG-17-001
2006.10165
29 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS muon trigger system in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JINST 16 (2021) P07001 CMS-MUO-19-001
2102.04790
30 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
31 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
32 T. Sjostrand et al. An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 CPC 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
33 R. Vogt The usage of the K factor in heavy ion physics Acta Phys. Hung. A 17 (2003) 75 hep-ph/0207359
34 Y. Li and F. Petriello Combining QCD and electroweak corrections to dilepton production in FEWZ PRD 86 (2012) 094034 1208.5967
35 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
36 M. Farina et al. Energy helps accuracy: Electroweak precision tests at hadron colliders PLB 772 (2017) 210 1609.08157
37 D. Pappadopulo, A. Thamm, R. Torre, and A. Wulzer Heavy vector triplets: Bridging theory and data JHEP 09 (2014) 060 1402.4431
38 CMS Collaboration Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements EPJC 80 (2020) 4 CMS-GEN-17-001
1903.12179
39 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions from high-precision collider data EPJC 77 (2017) 663 1706.00428
40 A. Arbuzov et al. Update of the MCSANC Monte Carlo integrator, v.1.20 JEPTL 103 (2016) 131 1509.03052
41 S. Alioli et al. Precision studies of observables in $ pp \to $ W $ \to l\nu $ and $ pp \to \gamma $,Z $ \to l^{+}l^{-} $ processes at the LHC EPJC 77 (2017) 280 1606.02330
42 V. Bertone, S. Carrazza, N. Hartland, and J. Rojo Illuminating the photon content of the proton within a global PDF analysis SciPost Phys. 5 (2018) 008 1712.07053
43 A. Manohar, P. Nason, G. P. Salam, and G. Zanderighi How bright is the proton? A precise determination of the photon parton distribution function PRL 117 (2016) 24 1607.04266
44 J. Butterworth et al. PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II JPG 43 (2016) 023001 1510.03865
45 R. Frederix and S. Frixione Merging meets matching in MC@NLO JHEP 12 (2012) 061 1209.6215
46 J. Alwall et al. Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions EPJC 53 (2008) 473 0706.2569
47 P. Nason A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms JHEP 11 (2004) 040 hep-ph/0409146
48 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method JHEP 11 (2007) 070 0709.2092
49 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
50 M. Czakon, P. Fiedler, and A. Mitov Total top-quark pair-production cross section at hadron colliders through $ \mathcal{O}({{\alpha}}_{S}^{4}) $ PRL 110 (2013) 252004 1303.6254
51 M. Czakon et al. Top-pair production at the LHC through NNLO QCD and NLO EW JHEP 10 (2017) 186 1705.04105
52 T. Gehrmann et al. $ {\mathrm{W}^{+}\mathrm{W}^{{-}}} $ production at hadron colliders in Next-to-next-to-leading order QCD PRL 113 (2014) 212001 1408.5243
53 J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, and C. Williams Vector boson pair production at the LHC JHEP 07 (2011) 018 1105.0020
54 F. Cascioli et al. ZZ production at hadron colliders in NNLO QCD PLB 735 (2014) 311
55 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT4--a simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
56 J. Allison et al. Recent developments in GEANT4 NIMA 835 (2016) 186
57 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 07 (2018) 161 CMS-FSQ-15-005
1802.02613
58 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ {k_{\mathrm{T}}} $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
59 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
60 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the cms detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
61 CMS Collaboration Search for narrow resonances in dilepton mass spectra in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV and combination with 8 TeV data PLB 768 (2017) 57 CMS-EXO-15-005
1609.05391
62 CMS Collaboration Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 16 (2021) P05014 CMS-EGM-17-001
2012.06888
63 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P06015 CMS-MUO-16-001
1804.04528
64 CMS Collaboration Performance of the reconstruction and identification of high-momentum muons in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JINST 15 (2020) P02027 CMS-MUO-17-001
1912.03516
65 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV JINST 12 (2017) P02014 CMS-JME-13-004
1607.03663
66 CMS Collaboration Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P05011 CMS-BTV-16-002
1712.07158
67 CMS Collaboration Determination of jet energy calibration and transverse momentum resolution in CMS JINST 6 (2011) P11002 CMS-JME-10-011
1107.4277
68 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the inclusive $ \mathrm{W} $ and $ \mathrm{Z} $ production cross sections in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV JHEP 10 (2011) 132 CMS-EWK-10-005
1107.4789
69 CMS Collaboration Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV in 2015 and 2016 at CMS EPJC 81 (2021) 800 CMS-LUM-17-003
2104.01927
70 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurement for the 2017 data-taking period at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004 CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004
71 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurement for the 2018 data-taking period at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002 CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002
72 J. S. Conway Incorporating nuisance parameters in likelihoods for multisource spectra 2011 1103.0354
73 R. Barlow and C. Beeston Fitting using finite Monte Carlo samples CPC 77 (1993) 219
74 F. James MINUIT: function minimization and error analysis reference manual CERN-D-506
75 CMS Collaboration Precise determination of the mass of the Higgs boson and tests of compatibility of its couplings with the standard model predictions using proton collisions at 7 and 8 TeV EPJC 75 (2015) 212 CMS-HIG-14-009
1412.8662
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN