CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-SMP-20-009 ; CERN-EP-2021-091
Measurements of Z bosons plus jets using variables sensitive to double parton scattering in pp collisions at 13 TeV
JHEP 10 (2021) 176
Abstract: Double parton scattering is investigated using events with a Z boson and jets. The measurements are performed with proton-proton collision data recorded by the CMS experiment at the LHC at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$ collected in the year 2016. Differential cross sections of Z+$\geq $ 1 jet and Z+$\geq $ 2 jets are measured with transverse momentum of the jets above 20 GeV and pseudorapidity $|{\eta}| < $ 2.4. Several distributions with sensitivity to double parton scattering effects are measured as functions of the angle and the transverse momentum imbalance between the Z boson and the jets. The measured distributions are compared with predictions from several event generators with different hadronization models and different parameter settings for multiparton interactions. The measured distributions show a dependence on the hadronization and multiparton interaction simulation parameters, and are important input for future improvements of the simulations.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Typical diagrams for Z+2 jets production in a single (left) and double parton (right) scattering process.

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
Typical diagram for Z+2 jets production in a single parton scattering process.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
Typical diagram for Z+2 jets production in a double parton scattering process.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Differential cross sections (left) and area-normalized distributions (right) as functions of $\Delta \phi $ between the Z boson and the leading jet for Z+$\geq $1 jet events. The uncertainties in the predictions are shown as coloured bands around the theoretical predictions including statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties for the NLO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CP5 tune) and the statistical uncertainty only for the LO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CP5 tune), NLO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CDPSTP8S1-WJ tune, CP5 tune with MPI-OFF), NLO MG5_aMC + HERWIG7 (with tune CH3), and SHERPA predictions. In the top panel, the vertical bars on the data points represent statistical uncertainties, whereas in the bottom panels, the total uncertainty in data is indicated by the solid yellow band centred at 1. In the legend, the $\chi ^{2}$ per degree of freedom is given to quantify the goodness of fit of the model to the data.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
Differential cross sections as functions of $\Delta \phi $ between the Z boson and the leading jet for Z+$\geq $1 jet events. The uncertainties in the predictions are shown as coloured bands around the theoretical predictions including statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties for the NLO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CP5 tune) and the statistical uncertainty only for the LO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CP5 tune), NLO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CDPSTP8S1-WJ tune, CP5 tune with MPI-OFF), NLO MG5_aMC + HERWIG7 (with tune CH3), and SHERPA predictions. In the top panel, the vertical bars on the data points represent statistical uncertainties, whereas in the bottom panels, the total uncertainty in data is indicated by the solid yellow band centred at 1. In the legend, the $\chi ^{2}$ per degree of freedom is given to quantify the goodness of fit of the model to the data.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
Area-normalized distributions as functions of $\Delta \phi $ between the Z boson and the leading jet for Z+$\geq $1 jet events. The uncertainties in the predictions are shown as coloured bands around the theoretical predictions including statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties for the NLO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CP5 tune) and the statistical uncertainty only for the LO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CP5 tune), NLO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CDPSTP8S1-WJ tune, CP5 tune with MPI-OFF), NLO MG5_aMC + HERWIG7 (with tune CH3), and SHERPA predictions. In the top panel, the vertical bars on the data points represent statistical uncertainties, whereas in the bottom panels, the total uncertainty in data is indicated by the solid yellow band centred at 1. In the legend, the $\chi ^{2}$ per degree of freedom is given to quantify the goodness of fit of the model to the data.

png pdf
Figure 3:
Differential cross sections (left) and area-normalized distributions (right) as functions of the ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ imbalance between the Z boson and the leading jet for Z+$\geq $1 jet events. The uncertainties in the predictions are shown as coloured bands around the theoretical predictions including statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties for the NLO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CP5 tune) and the statistical uncertainty only for the LO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CP5 tune), NLO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CDPSTP8S1-WJ tune, CP5 tune with MPI-OFF), NLO MG5_aMC + HERWIG7 (with tune CH3), and SHERPA predictions. In the top panel, the vertical bars on the data points represent statistical uncertainties, whereas in the bottom panels, the total uncertainty in data is indicated by the solid yellow band centred at 1. In the legend, the $\chi ^{2}$ per degree of freedom is given to quantify the goodness of fit of the model to the data.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
Differential cross sections as functions of the ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ imbalance between the Z boson and the leading jet for Z+$\geq $1 jet events. The uncertainties in the predictions are shown as coloured bands around the theoretical predictions including statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties for the NLO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CP5 tune) and the statistical uncertainty only for the LO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CP5 tune), NLO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CDPSTP8S1-WJ tune, CP5 tune with MPI-OFF), NLO MG5_aMC + HERWIG7 (with tune CH3), and SHERPA predictions. In the top panel, the vertical bars on the data points represent statistical uncertainties, whereas in the bottom panels, the total uncertainty in data is indicated by the solid yellow band centred at 1. In the legend, the $\chi ^{2}$ per degree of freedom is given to quantify the goodness of fit of the model to the data.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
Area-normalized distributions as functions of the ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ imbalance between the Z boson and the leading jet for Z+$\geq $1 jet events. The uncertainties in the predictions are shown as coloured bands around the theoretical predictions including statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties for the NLO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CP5 tune) and the statistical uncertainty only for the LO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CP5 tune), NLO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CDPSTP8S1-WJ tune, CP5 tune with MPI-OFF), NLO MG5_aMC + HERWIG7 (with tune CH3), and SHERPA predictions. In the top panel, the vertical bars on the data points represent statistical uncertainties, whereas in the bottom panels, the total uncertainty in data is indicated by the solid yellow band centred at 1. In the legend, the $\chi ^{2}$ per degree of freedom is given to quantify the goodness of fit of the model to the data.

png pdf
Figure 4:
Differential cross sections (left) and area-normalized distributions (right) as functions of $\Delta \phi $ between the Z boson and the dijet for Z+$\geq $2 jet events. The uncertainties in the predictions are shown as coloured bands around the theoretical predictions including statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties for the NLO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CP5 tune) and the statistical uncertainty only for the LO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CP5 tune), NLO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CDPSTP8S1-WJ tune, CP5 tune with MPI-OFF), NLO MG5_aMC + HERWIG7 (with tune CH3), and SHERPA predictions. In the top panel, the vertical bars on the data points represent statistical uncertainties, whereas in the bottom panels, the total uncertainty in data is indicated by the solid yellow band centred at 1. In the legend, the $\chi ^{2}$ per degree of freedom is given to quantify the goodness of fit of the model to the data.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
Differential cross sections as functions of $\Delta \phi $ between the Z boson and the dijet for Z+$\geq $2 jet events. The uncertainties in the predictions are shown as coloured bands around the theoretical predictions including statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties for the NLO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CP5 tune) and the statistical uncertainty only for the LO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CP5 tune), NLO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CDPSTP8S1-WJ tune, CP5 tune with MPI-OFF), NLO MG5_aMC + HERWIG7 (with tune CH3), and SHERPA predictions. In the top panel, the vertical bars on the data points represent statistical uncertainties, whereas in the bottom panels, the total uncertainty in data is indicated by the solid yellow band centred at 1. In the legend, the $\chi ^{2}$ per degree of freedom is given to quantify the goodness of fit of the model to the data.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
Area-normalized distributions as functions of $\Delta \phi $ between the Z boson and the dijet for Z+$\geq $2 jet events. The uncertainties in the predictions are shown as coloured bands around the theoretical predictions including statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties for the NLO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CP5 tune) and the statistical uncertainty only for the LO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CP5 tune), NLO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CDPSTP8S1-WJ tune, CP5 tune with MPI-OFF), NLO MG5_aMC + HERWIG7 (with tune CH3), and SHERPA predictions. In the top panel, the vertical bars on the data points represent statistical uncertainties, whereas in the bottom panels, the total uncertainty in data is indicated by the solid yellow band centred at 1. In the legend, the $\chi ^{2}$ per degree of freedom is given to quantify the goodness of fit of the model to the data.

png pdf
Figure 5:
Differential cross sections (left) and area-normalized distributions (right) as functions of the ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ imbalance between the Z boson and the dijet for Z+$\geq $2 jet events. The uncertainties in the predictions are shown as coloured bands around the theoretical predictions including statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties for the NLO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CP5 tune) and the statistical uncertainty only for the LO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CP5 tune), NLO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CDPSTP8S1-WJ tune, CP5 tune with MPI-OFF), NLO MG5_aMC + HERWIG7 (with tune CH3), and SHERPA predictions. In the top panel, the vertical bars on the data points represent statistical uncertainties, whereas in the bottom panels, the total uncertainty in data is indicated by the solid yellow band centred at 1. In the legend, the $\chi ^{2}$ per degree of freedom is given to quantify the goodness of fit of the model to the data.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
Differential cross sections as functions of the ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ imbalance between the Z boson and the dijet for Z+$\geq $2 jet events. The uncertainties in the predictions are shown as coloured bands around the theoretical predictions including statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties for the NLO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CP5 tune) and the statistical uncertainty only for the LO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CP5 tune), NLO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CDPSTP8S1-WJ tune, CP5 tune with MPI-OFF), NLO MG5_aMC + HERWIG7 (with tune CH3), and SHERPA predictions. In the top panel, the vertical bars on the data points represent statistical uncertainties, whereas in the bottom panels, the total uncertainty in data is indicated by the solid yellow band centred at 1. In the legend, the $\chi ^{2}$ per degree of freedom is given to quantify the goodness of fit of the model to the data.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
Area-normalized distributions as functions of the ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ imbalance between the Z boson and the dijet for Z+$\geq $2 jet events. The uncertainties in the predictions are shown as coloured bands around the theoretical predictions including statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties for the NLO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CP5 tune) and the statistical uncertainty only for the LO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CP5 tune), NLO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CDPSTP8S1-WJ tune, CP5 tune with MPI-OFF), NLO MG5_aMC + HERWIG7 (with tune CH3), and SHERPA predictions. In the top panel, the vertical bars on the data points represent statistical uncertainties, whereas in the bottom panels, the total uncertainty in data is indicated by the solid yellow band centred at 1. In the legend, the $\chi ^{2}$ per degree of freedom is given to quantify the goodness of fit of the model to the data.

png pdf
Figure 6:
Differential cross sections (left) and area-normalized distributions (right) as functions of the ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ imbalance between leading and subleading jets for Z+$\geq $2 jet events. The uncertainties in the predictions are shown as coloured bands around the theoretical predictions including statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties for the NLO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CP5 tune) and the statistical uncertainty only for the LO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CP5 tune), NLO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CDPSTP8S1-WJ tune, CP5 tune with MPI-OFF), NLO MG5_aMC + HERWIG7 (with tune CH3), and SHERPA predictions. In the top panel, the vertical bars on the data points represent statistical uncertainties, whereas in the bottom panels, the total uncertainty in data is indicated by the solid yellow band centred at 1. In the legend, the $\chi ^{2}$ per degree of freedom is given to quantify the goodness of fit of the model to the data.

png pdf
Figure 6-a:
Differential cross sections as functions of the ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ imbalance between leading and subleading jets for Z+$\geq $2 jet events. The uncertainties in the predictions are shown as coloured bands around the theoretical predictions including statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties for the NLO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CP5 tune) and the statistical uncertainty only for the LO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CP5 tune), NLO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CDPSTP8S1-WJ tune, CP5 tune with MPI-OFF), NLO MG5_aMC + HERWIG7 (with tune CH3), and SHERPA predictions. In the top panel, the vertical bars on the data points represent statistical uncertainties, whereas in the bottom panels, the total uncertainty in data is indicated by the solid yellow band centred at 1. In the legend, the $\chi ^{2}$ per degree of freedom is given to quantify the goodness of fit of the model to the data.

png pdf
Figure 6-b:
Area-normalized distributions as functions of the ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ imbalance between leading and subleading jets for Z+$\geq $2 jet events. The uncertainties in the predictions are shown as coloured bands around the theoretical predictions including statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties for the NLO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CP5 tune) and the statistical uncertainty only for the LO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CP5 tune), NLO MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 (with CDPSTP8S1-WJ tune, CP5 tune with MPI-OFF), NLO MG5_aMC + HERWIG7 (with tune CH3), and SHERPA predictions. In the top panel, the vertical bars on the data points represent statistical uncertainties, whereas in the bottom panels, the total uncertainty in data is indicated by the solid yellow band centred at 1. In the legend, the $\chi ^{2}$ per degree of freedom is given to quantify the goodness of fit of the model to the data.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Summary of event generators with their k-factors (ratio of NNLO to NLO/LO cross section), PDF sets, and tunes used to produce both the signal and background event samples.

png pdf
Table 2:
Fiducial selections at particle level.

png pdf
Table 3:
Uncertainty sources and their effect on the differential cross section distributions.

png pdf
Table 4:
Uncertainty sources and their effect on the area-normalized distributions.

png pdf
Table 5:
Measured and predicted cross section for Z+$\geq $1 jet and Z+$\geq $2 jet production. Simulations are normalized to NNLO calculations (from FEWZ) and reported cross section values are extracted by applying fiducial selections. Predicted cross sections include statistical and theoretical uncertainties added in quadrature for MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 with CP5 tune, whereas the other predicted cross sections are reported with only statistical uncertainties.
Summary
The CMS Collaboration has measured the differential cross sections for Z+$\geq $1 jet and Z+$\geq $2 jet events using proton-proton collision data at $\sqrt{s} $ = 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$ collected in the year 2016. The Z boson is reconstructed using the dimuon channel. This is the first measurement performed to explore observables sensitive to the presence of multi-parton interaction (MPI) using the Z+jets process at 13 TeV. Within the fiducial region, the production cross sections of Z+$\geq $1 jet and Z+$\geq $2 jet events are measured to be 158.5 $\pm$ 0.3 (stat) $\pm$ 7.0 (syst) $\pm$ 1.2 (theo) $\pm$ 4.0 (lumi) pb and 44.8 $\pm$ 0.4 (stat) $\pm$ 3.7 (syst) $\pm$ 0.5 (theo) $\pm$ 1.1 (lumi) pb, respectively. The measured integrated cross section in the fiducial region with jets is well described by the event generators SHERPA, MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8, and MG5_aMC + {HERWIG}7 predictions. The prediction obtained with MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 with the double parton scattering (DPS) specific tune CDPSTP8S1-WJ overestimates the measurements by 10-15%, but correctly describes the shape of all the observables. The prediction from MG5_aMC + PYTHIA8 with the CP5 tune, derived by fitting soft quantum chromodynamics (QCD) measurements, describes the differential cross section and area-normalized distributions. However, there are parts of the distributions that are not well described, such as single parton scattering that dominates lower regions of transverse momentum imbalance $\Delta_\mathrm{rel}{p_{\mathrm{T}}}$ distributions. Predictions with other MPI models describe the measurements well (SHERPA) or reasonably well (MG5_aMC + HERWIG7) except a few deviations in describing the shapes of the $\Delta \phi (\mathrm{Z}, j_1)$ and $\Delta_{\mathrm{rel}}{p_{\mathrm{T}}}(j_1,j_2)$ distributions. The measured distributions show a significant sensitivity to MPI. A proper simulation of MPI is essential to describe the shape of the measured distributions and hence these results are a useful input to further improve DPS-specific tunes and a global tune in combination with other soft QCD measurements.
References
1 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the production cross section of jets in association with a Z boson in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 07 (2013) 032 1304.7098
2 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the production cross section for $ Z/\gamma^* $ in association with jets in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector. PRD 85 (2011) 032009 1111.2690
3 CMS Collaboration Jet production rates in association with $ W $ and $ Z $ bosons in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV JHEP 01 (2012) 010 CMS-EWK-10-012
1110.3226
4 CMS Collaboration Measurements of jet multiplicity and differential production cross sections of Z+jets events in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV PRD 91 (2015) 052008 CMS-SMP-12-017
1408.3104
5 CMS Collaboration Event shapes and azimuthal correlations in Z+jets events in $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV PLB 722 (2013) 238 CMS-EWK-11-021
1301.1646
6 CMS Collaboration Comparison of the Z/$ \gamma ^{*} $ + jets to $ \gamma $ + jets cross sections in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV JHEP 10 (2015) 128 CMS-SMP-14-005
1505.06520
7 CMS Collaboration Measurements of differential production cross sections for a Z boson in association with jets in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV JHEP 04 (2017) 022 CMS-SMP-14-013
1611.03844
8 CMS Collaboration Measurement of differential cross sections for Z boson production in association with jets in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV EPJC 78 (2018) 965 CMS-SMP-16-015
1804.05252
9 ATLAS Collaboration Measurements of the production cross-section for a $ Z $ boson in association with b-jets in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 07 (2020) 044 2003.11960
10 CMS Collaboration Constraints on the double-parton scattering cross section from same-sign W boson pair production in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV JHEP 02 (2018) 032 CMS-FSQ-16-005
1712.02280
11 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of hard double-parton interactions in W$ (\to {l\nu}) $+ 2 jet events at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector New J. Phys. 15 (2013) 033038 1301.6872
12 CMS Collaboration Study of double parton scattering using W + 2-jet events in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV JHEP 03 (2014) 032 CMS-FSQ-12-028
1312.5729
13 ATLAS Collaboration Study of the hard double-parton scattering contribution to inclusive four-lepton production in pp collisions at $ \sqrt s= $ 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector PLB 790 (2019) 595 1811.11094
14 ATLAS Collaboration Observation and measurements of the production of prompt and non-prompt J/$ \psi $ mesons in association with a $ Z $ boson in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector EPJC 75 (2015) 229 1412.6428
15 D0 Collaboration Double parton interactions in $ \gamma $+3 jet events in p$ \overline{\mbox{p}} $ collisions $ \sqrt{s}= $ 1.96 TeV. PRD 81 (2010) 052012 0912.5104
16 CMS Collaboration Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements EPJC 80 (2020) 4 CMS-GEN-17-001
1903.12179
17 CMS Collaboration Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements EPJC 76 (2016) 155 CMS-GEN-14-001
1512.00815
18 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P06015 CMS-MUO-16-001
1804.04528
19 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JINST 15 (2020) P10017 CMS-TRG-17-001
2006.10165
20 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
21 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
22 J. Alwall et al. Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions EPJC 53 (2008) 473 0706.2569
23 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions for the LHC Run II JHEP 04 (2015) 040 1410.8849
24 Sherpa Collaboration Event generation with Sherpa 2.2 SciPost Phys. 7 (2019) 034 1905.09127
25 S. Hoeche, F. Krauss, M. Schonherr, and F. Siegert QCD matrix elements + parton showers: The NLO case JHEP 04 (2013) 027 1207.5030
26 T. Gehrmann et al. NLO QCD matrix elements + parton showers in e$ ^{+} $e$ ^{-} \to $ hadrons JHEP 01 (2013) 144 1207.5031
27 S. Hoeche et al. Triple vector boson production through Higgs-Strahlung with NLO multijet merging PRD 89 (2014) 093015 1403.7516
28 T. Sjostrand et al. An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 CPC 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
29 M. Czakon, P. Fiedler, and A. Mitov Total top-quark pair-production cross section at hadron colliders through $ O(\alpha^4_S) $ PRL 110 (2013) 252004 1303.6254
30 P. Barnreuther, M. Czakon, and A. Mitov Percent level precision physics at the Tevatron: first genuine NNLO QCD corrections to $ \mathrm{q} \overline{\mathrm{q}} \to \mathrm{t\overline{t}} + \mathrm{X} $ PRL 109 (2012) 132001 1204.5201
31 M. Beneke, P. Falgari, S. Klein, and C. Schwinn Hadronic top-quark pair production with NNLL threshold resummation NPB 855 (2012) 695 1109.1536
32 M. Cacciari et al. Top-pair production at hadron colliders with next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic soft-gluon resummation PLB 710 (2012) 612 1111.5869
33 M. Czakon and A. Mitov NNLO corrections to top-pair production at hadron colliders: the all-fermionic scattering channels JHEP 12 (2012) 054 1207.0236
34 M. Czakon and A. Mitov NNLO corrections to top pair production at hadron colliders: the quark-gluon reaction JHEP 01 (2013) 080 1210.6832
35 M. Czakon and A. Mitov Top++: A program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders CPC 185 (2014) 2930 1112.5675
36 J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, and C. Williams Vector boson pair production at the LHC JHEP 07 (2011) 018 1105.0020
37 N. Kidonakis Top Quark Production in Proceedings, Helmholtz International Summer School on Physics of Heavy Quarks and Hadrons (HQ 2013): JINR, Dubna, Russia, July 15-28, 2013, p. 139 (2014) 1311.0283
38 CMS Collaboration Investigations of the impact of the parton shower tuning in PYTHIA 8 in the modelling of $ \mathrm{t\overline{t}} $ at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 and 13 TeV CMS-PAS-TOP-16-021 CMS-PAS-TOP-16-021
39 R. D. Ball et al. Parton distributions with LHC data NPB 867 (2013) 244 1207.1303
40 J. Alwall et al. MadGraph 5: going beyond JHEP 06 (2011) 128 1106.0522
41 J. Alwall, S. de Visscher, and F. Maltoni QCD radiation in the production of heavy colored particles at the LHC JHEP 02 (2009) 017 0810.5350
42 R. Frederix and S. Frixione Merging meets matching in MC@NLO JHEP 12 (2012) 061 1209.6215
43 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT4--a simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
44 T. Sjostrand and M. van Zijl A multiple interaction model for the event structure in hadron collisions PRD 36 (1987) 2019
45 M. Bahr et al. Herwig++ physics and manual EPJC 58 (2008) 639 0803.0883
46 J. Bellm et al. Herwig 7.0/Herwig++ 3.0 release note EPJC 76 (2016) 196 1512.01178
47 J. Bellm et al. Herwig 7.1 release note CERN theory preprint CERN-PH-TH-2017-109 1705.06919
48 CMS Collaboration Development and validation of HERWIG 7 tunes from CMS underlying-event measurements EPJC 81 (2021) 312 CMS-GEN-19-001
2011.03422
49 K. Melnikov and F. Petriello Electroweak gauge boson production at hadron colliders through O($ \alpha_{s}^{2} $) PRD 74 (2006) 114017 hep-ph/0609070
50 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
51 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ {k_{\mathrm{T}}} $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
52 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
53 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the inclusive $ W $ and $ Z $ production cross sections in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV JHEP 10 (2011) 132 CMS-EWK-10-005
1107.4789
54 M. Cacciari and G. P. Salam Pileup subtraction using jet areas PLB 659 (2008) 119 0707.1378
55 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV JINST 12 (2017) P02014 CMS-JME-13-004
1607.03663
56 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution performance with 13 TeV data collected by CMS in 2016 CDS
57 CMS Collaboration Jet performance in pp collisions at 7 TeV CDS
58 CMS Collaboration Pileup jet identification CMS-PAS-JME-13-005 CMS-PAS-JME-13-005
59 CMS Collaboration Pileup mitigation at CMS in 13 TeV data JINST 15 (2020) P09018 CMS-JME-18-001
2003.00503
60 CMS Collaboration Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 16 (2021) P05014 CMS-EGM-17-001
2012.06888
61 S. Schmitt TUnfold: an algorithm for correcting migration effects in high energy physics JINST 7 (2012) T10003 1205.6201
62 A. N. Tikhonov Solution of incorrectly formulated problems and the regularization method Soviet Math. Dokl. 4 (1963) 1035
63 CMS Collaboration Object definitions for top quark analyses at the particle level CDS
64 J. Butterworth et al. PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II JPG 43 (2016) 023001 1510.03865
65 CMS Collaboration Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV in 2015 and 2016 at CMS Submitted to EPJC CMS-LUM-17-003
2104.01927
66 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 07 (2018) 161 CMS-FSQ-15-005
1802.02613
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN