CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-EXO-19-016 ; CERN-EP-2023-144
Search for a third-generation leptoquark coupled to a $ \tau $ lepton and a b quark through single, pair, and nonresonant production in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV
Accepted for publication in J. High Energy Phys.
Abstract: A search is presented for a third-generation leptoquark (LQ) coupled exclusively to a $ \tau $ lepton and a b quark. The search is based on proton-proton collision data at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV recorded with the CMS detector, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$ ^{-1} $. Events with $ \tau $ leptons and a varying number of jets originating from b quarks are considered, targeting the single and pair production of LQs, as well as nonresonant $ t $-channel LQ exchange. An excess is observed in the data with respect to the background expectation in the combined analysis of all search regions. For a benchmark LQ mass of 2 TeV and an LQ-b-$\tau $ coupling strength of 2.5, the excess reaches a local significance of up to 2.8 standard deviations. Upper limits at the 95% confidence level are placed on the LQ production cross section in the LQ mass range 0.5-2.3 TeV, and up to 3 TeV for $ t $-channel LQ exchange. Leptoquarks are excluded below masses of 1.22-1.88 TeV for different LQ models and varying coupling strengths up to 2.5. The study of nonresonant $ \tau\tau $ production through $ t $-channel LQ exchange allows lower limits on the LQ mass of up to 2.3 TeV to be obtained.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Example Feynman diagrams of signal processes at leading order: single (left) and pair (center) LQ production, as well as nonresonant production of two $ \tau $ leptons via $ t $-channel LQ exchange (right).

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
Example Feynman diagram at leading order of single LQ production.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
Example Feynman diagram at leading order of pair LQ production.

png pdf
Figure 1-c:
Example Feynman diagram at leading order of nonresonant production of two $ \tau $ leptons via $ t $-channel LQ exchange.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Product of acceptance and efficiency for a vector LQ signal in the $ \tau_\mathrm{h}\tau_\mathrm{h} $ (left) and $ \mu\tau_\mathrm{h} $ (right) channels of the 0b and $ \geq $1b (upper), and the 0j categories (lower). The resonant LQ signals are neglected in the 0j category. Vertical bars (only just visible) indicate the statistical uncertainty.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
Product of acceptance and efficiency for a vector LQ signal in the $ \tau_\mathrm{h}\tau_\mathrm{h} $ channel of the 0b and $ \geq $1b categories. Vertical bars (only just visible) indicate the statistical uncertainty.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
Product of acceptance and efficiency for a vector LQ signal in the $ \mu\tau_\mathrm{h} $ channel of the 0b and $ \geq $1b categories. Vertical bars (only just visible) indicate the statistical uncertainty.

png pdf
Figure 2-c:
Product of acceptance and efficiency for a vector LQ signal in the $ \tau_\mathrm{h}\tau_\mathrm{h} $ channel of the 0j category. The resonant LQ signals are neglected. Vertical bars (only just visible) indicate the statistical uncertainty.

png pdf
Figure 2-d:
Product of acceptance and efficiency for a vector LQ signal in the $ \mu\tau_\mathrm{h} $ channel of the 0j category. The resonant LQ signals are neglected. Vertical bars (only just visible) indicate the statistical uncertainty.

png pdf
Figure 3:
Postfit distributions of $ S_\mathrm{T}^\text{MET} $ for the combined 2016-2018 data set after a simultaneous fit of the background and vector LQ signal to the data. The last bin includes the overflow. The $ \mathrm{e}\mu $ (top), $ \ell\tau_\mathrm{h} $ (center), and $ \tau_\mathrm{h}\tau_\mathrm{h} $ (bottom) channels in the 0b (left) and $ \geq $1b (right) categories are shown. The fitted signal distribution for the total vector LQ signal (red line) with a mass of 2000 GeV, $ \lambda = $ 2.5, and $ \kappa= $ 1 is overlaid. In each distribution, the lower panel shows the ratio of the data (black markers) or the sum of the postfit signal and background (red line) to the postfit background. The hatched band indicates the total postfit uncertainty in the background.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
Postfit distribution of $ S_\mathrm{T}^\text{MET} $ for the combined 2016-2018 data set after a simultaneous fit of the background and vector LQ signal to the data. The last bin includes the overflow. The $ \mathrm{e}\mu $ channel in the 0b category is shown. The fitted signal distribution for the total vector LQ signal (red line) with a mass of 2000 GeV, $ \lambda = $ 2.5, and $ \kappa= $ 1 is overlaid. The lower panel shows the ratio of the data (black markers) or the sum of the postfit signal and background (red line) to the postfit background. The hatched band indicates the total postfit uncertainty in the background.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
Postfit distribution of $ S_\mathrm{T}^\text{MET} $ for the combined 2016-2018 data set after a simultaneous fit of the background and vector LQ signal to the data. The last bin includes the overflow. The $ \mathrm{e}\mu $ channel in the $ \geq $1b category is shown. The fitted signal distribution for the total vector LQ signal (red line) with a mass of 2000 GeV, $ \lambda = $ 2.5, and $ \kappa= $ 1 is overlaid. The lower panel shows the ratio of the data (black markers) or the sum of the postfit signal and background (red line) to the postfit background. The hatched band indicates the total postfit uncertainty in the background.

png pdf
Figure 3-c:
Postfit distribution of $ S_\mathrm{T}^\text{MET} $ for the combined 2016-2018 data set after a simultaneous fit of the background and vector LQ signal to the data. The last bin includes the overflow. The $ \ell\tau_\mathrm{h} $ channel in the 0b category is shown. The fitted signal distribution for the total vector LQ signal (red line) with a mass of 2000 GeV, $ \lambda = $ 2.5, and $ \kappa= $ 1 is overlaid. The lower panel shows the ratio of the data (black markers) or the sum of the postfit signal and background (red line) to the postfit background. The hatched band indicates the total postfit uncertainty in the background.

png pdf
Figure 3-d:
Postfit distribution of $ S_\mathrm{T}^\text{MET} $ for the combined 2016-2018 data set after a simultaneous fit of the background and vector LQ signal to the data. The last bin includes the overflow. The $ \ell\tau_\mathrm{h} $ channel in the $ \geq $1b category is shown. The fitted signal distribution for the total vector LQ signal (red line) with a mass of 2000 GeV, $ \lambda = $ 2.5, and $ \kappa= $ 1 is overlaid. The lower panel shows the ratio of the data (black markers) or the sum of the postfit signal and background (red line) to the postfit background. The hatched band indicates the total postfit uncertainty in the background.

png pdf
Figure 3-e:
Postfit distribution of $ S_\mathrm{T}^\text{MET} $ for the combined 2016-2018 data set after a simultaneous fit of the background and vector LQ signal to the data. The last bin includes the overflow. The $ \tau_\mathrm{h}\tau_\mathrm{h} $ channel in the 0b category is shown. The fitted signal distribution for the total vector LQ signal (red line) with a mass of 2000 GeV, $ \lambda = $ 2.5, and $ \kappa= $ 1 is overlaid. The lower panel shows the ratio of the data (black markers) or the sum of the postfit signal and background (red line) to the postfit background. The hatched band indicates the total postfit uncertainty in the background.

png pdf
Figure 3-f:
Postfit distribution of $ S_\mathrm{T}^\text{MET} $ for the combined 2016-2018 data set after a simultaneous fit of the background and vector LQ signal to the data. The last bin includes the overflow. The $ \tau_\mathrm{h}\tau_\mathrm{h} $ channel in the $ \geq $1b category is shown. The fitted signal distribution for the total vector LQ signal (red line) with a mass of 2000 GeV, $ \lambda = $ 2.5, and $ \kappa= $ 1 is overlaid. The lower panel shows the ratio of the data (black markers) or the sum of the postfit signal and background (red line) to the postfit background. The hatched band indicates the total postfit uncertainty in the background.

png pdf
Figure 4:
Postfit distributions of $ \chi $ for the combined 2016-2018 data set after a simultaneous fit of the background and vector LQ signal to the data. The last bin includes the overflow. The $ \mathrm{e}\mu $ (top), $ \ell\tau_\mathrm{h} $ (center), and $ \tau_\mathrm{h}\tau_\mathrm{h} $ (bottom) channels in the 400 $ < m_{\text{vis}} < $ 600 GeV (left) and $ m_{\text{vis}} > $ 600 GeV (right) categories are shown. The fitted signal distribution for the nonresonant vector LQ model (red line) with a mass of 2000 GeV, $ \lambda = $ 2.5, and $ \kappa= $ 1 is overlaid. The contribution from resonant LQ production is neglected. In each distribution, the lower panel shows the ratio of the data (black markers) or the sum of the postfit signal and background (red line) to the postfit background. The hatched band indicates the total postfit uncertainty in the background.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
Postfit distributions of $ \chi $ for the combined 2016-2018 data set after a simultaneous fit of the background and vector LQ signal to the data. The last bin includes the overflow. The $ \mathrm{e}\mu $ channel in the 400 $ < m_{\text{vis}} < $ 600 GeV category is shown. The fitted signal distribution for the nonresonant vector LQ model (red line) with a mass of 2000 GeV, $ \lambda = $ 2.5, and $ \kappa= $ 1 is overlaid. The contribution from resonant LQ production is neglected. The lower panel shows the ratio of the data (black markers) or the sum of the postfit signal and background (red line) to the postfit background. The hatched band indicates the total postfit uncertainty in the background.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
Postfit distributions of $ \chi $ for the combined 2016-2018 data set after a simultaneous fit of the background and vector LQ signal to the data. The last bin includes the overflow. The $ \mathrm{e}\mu $ channel in the $ m_{\text{vis}} > $ 600 GeV category is shown. The fitted signal distribution for the nonresonant vector LQ model (red line) with a mass of 2000 GeV, $ \lambda = $ 2.5, and $ \kappa= $ 1 is overlaid. The contribution from resonant LQ production is neglected. The lower panel shows the ratio of the data (black markers) or the sum of the postfit signal and background (red line) to the postfit background. The hatched band indicates the total postfit uncertainty in the background.

png pdf
Figure 4-c:
Postfit distributions of $ \chi $ for the combined 2016-2018 data set after a simultaneous fit of the background and vector LQ signal to the data. The last bin includes the overflow. The $ \ell\tau_\mathrm{h} $ channel in the 400 $ < m_{\text{vis}} < $ 600 GeV category is shown. The fitted signal distribution for the nonresonant vector LQ model (red line) with a mass of 2000 GeV, $ \lambda = $ 2.5, and $ \kappa= $ 1 is overlaid. The contribution from resonant LQ production is neglected. The lower panel shows the ratio of the data (black markers) or the sum of the postfit signal and background (red line) to the postfit background. The hatched band indicates the total postfit uncertainty in the background.

png pdf
Figure 4-d:
Postfit distributions of $ \chi $ for the combined 2016-2018 data set after a simultaneous fit of the background and vector LQ signal to the data. The last bin includes the overflow. The $ \ell\tau_\mathrm{h} $ channel in the $ m_{\text{vis}} > $ 600 GeV category is shown. The fitted signal distribution for the nonresonant vector LQ model (red line) with a mass of 2000 GeV, $ \lambda = $ 2.5, and $ \kappa= $ 1 is overlaid. The contribution from resonant LQ production is neglected. The lower panel shows the ratio of the data (black markers) or the sum of the postfit signal and background (red line) to the postfit background. The hatched band indicates the total postfit uncertainty in the background.

png pdf
Figure 4-e:
Postfit distributions of $ \chi $ for the combined 2016-2018 data set after a simultaneous fit of the background and vector LQ signal to the data. The last bin includes the overflow. The $ \tau_\mathrm{h}\tau_\mathrm{h} $ channel in the 400 $ < m_{\text{vis}} < $ 600 GeV category is shown. The fitted signal distribution for the nonresonant vector LQ model (red line) with a mass of 2000 GeV, $ \lambda = $ 2.5, and $ \kappa= $ 1 is overlaid. The contribution from resonant LQ production is neglected. The lower panel shows the ratio of the data (black markers) or the sum of the postfit signal and background (red line) to the postfit background. The hatched band indicates the total postfit uncertainty in the background.

png pdf
Figure 4-f:
Postfit distributions of $ \chi $ for the combined 2016-2018 data set after a simultaneous fit of the background and vector LQ signal to the data. The last bin includes the overflow. The $ \tau_\mathrm{h}\tau_\mathrm{h} $ channel in the $ m_{\text{vis}} > $ 600 GeV category is shown. The fitted signal distribution for the nonresonant vector LQ model (red line) with a mass of 2000 GeV, $ \lambda = $ 2.5, and $ \kappa= $ 1 is overlaid. The contribution from resonant LQ production is neglected. The lower panel shows the ratio of the data (black markers) or the sum of the postfit signal and background (red line) to the postfit background. The hatched band indicates the total postfit uncertainty in the background.

png pdf
Figure 5:
Observed and expected upper limit on the total cross section of a scalar LQ signal with $ \lambda= $ 1 (left) and 2.5 (right) at the 95% CL under the assumption of exclusive LQ couplings to b quarks and $ \tau $ leptons. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The red line shows the cross section with the shaded band indicating the theoretical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
Observed and expected upper limit on the total cross section of a scalar LQ signal with $ \lambda= $ 1 at the 95% CL under the assumption of exclusive LQ couplings to b quarks and $ \tau $ leptons. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The red line shows the cross section with the shaded band indicating the theoretical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
Observed and expected upper limit on the total cross section of a scalar LQ signal with $ \lambda= $ 2.5 at the 95% CL under the assumption of exclusive LQ couplings to b quarks and $ \tau $ leptons. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The red line shows the cross section with the shaded band indicating the theoretical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 6:
Observed and expected upper limit on the total cross section of a vector LQ signal with $ \lambda= $ 1 (left) and 2.5 (right) at the 95% CL under the assumption of exclusive LQ couplings to b quarks and $ \tau $ leptons. The upper (lower) row assumes a coupling parameter $ \kappa= $ 1 (0). The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The red line shows the cross section calculated at LO with the shaded band indicating the theoretical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 6-a:
Observed and expected upper limit on the total cross section of a vector LQ signal with $ \lambda= $ 1 at the 95% CL under the assumption of exclusive LQ couplings to b quarks and $ \tau $ leptons. A coupling parameter $ \kappa= $ 1 is assumed. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The red line shows the cross section calculated at LO with the shaded band indicating the theoretical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 6-b:
Observed and expected upper limit on the total cross section of a vector LQ signal with $ \lambda= $ 2.5 at the 95% CL under the assumption of exclusive LQ couplings to b quarks and $ \tau $ leptons. A coupling parameter $ \kappa= $ 1 is assumed. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The red line shows the cross section calculated at LO with the shaded band indicating the theoretical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 6-c:
Observed and expected upper limit on the total cross section of a vector LQ signal with $ \lambda= $ 1 at the 95% CL under the assumption of exclusive LQ couplings to b quarks and $ \tau $ leptons. A coupling parameter $ \kappa= $ 0 is assumed. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The red line shows the cross section calculated at LO with the shaded band indicating the theoretical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 6-d:
Observed and expected upper limit on the total cross section of a vector LQ signal with $ \lambda= $ 2.5 at the 95% CL under the assumption of exclusive LQ couplings to b quarks and $ \tau $ leptons. A coupling parameter $ \kappa= $ 0 is assumed. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The red line shows the cross section calculated at LO with the shaded band indicating the theoretical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 7:
Observed and expected upper limit at the 95% CL on the coupling strength $ \lambda $ of a scalar LQ under the assumption of exclusive LQ couplings to b quarks and $ \tau $ leptons. The limits derived for the single (green), pair (red), nonresonant (orange), and total LQ production (black) are shown. The shaded bands around the expected limit lines correspond to the regions containing 68% of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The hatches indicate the excluded side of the parameter space with respect to the combined observed limit.

png pdf
Figure 8:
Observed and expected upper limit at the 95% CL on the coupling strength $ \lambda $ of a vector LQ model with $ \kappa= $ 0 (left) and $ \kappa= $ 1 (right) under the assumption of exclusive LQ couplings to b quarks and $ \tau $ leptons. The limits derived for the single (green), pair (red), nonresonant (orange), and total LQ production (black) are shown. The shaded bands around the expected limit lines correspond to the regions containing 68% of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The hatches indicate the excluded side of the parameter space with respect to the combined observed limit. The region with blue shading shows the parameter space preferred by one of the models proposed to explain the B physics anomalies [61].

png pdf
Figure 8-a:
Observed and expected upper limit at the 95% CL on the coupling strength $ \lambda $ of a vector LQ model with $ \kappa= $ 0 under the assumption of exclusive LQ couplings to b quarks and $ \tau $ leptons. The limits derived for the single (green), pair (red), nonresonant (orange), and total LQ production (black) are shown. The shaded bands around the expected limit lines correspond to the regions containing 68% of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The hatches indicate the excluded side of the parameter space with respect to the combined observed limit. The region with blue shading shows the parameter space preferred by one of the models proposed to explain the B physics anomalies [61].

png pdf
Figure 8-b:
Observed and expected upper limit at the 95% CL on the coupling strength $ \lambda $ of a vector LQ model with $ \kappa= $ 1 under the assumption of exclusive LQ couplings to b quarks and $ \tau $ leptons. The limits derived for the single (green), pair (red), nonresonant (orange), and total LQ production (black) are shown. The shaded bands around the expected limit lines correspond to the regions containing 68% of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The hatches indicate the excluded side of the parameter space with respect to the combined observed limit. The region with blue shading shows the parameter space preferred by one of the models proposed to explain the B physics anomalies [61].

png pdf
Figure 9:
Observed and expected upper limit at the 95% CL on the coupling strength $ \lambda $ of a scalar (left) and vector LQ model (right) determined by considering only the nonresonant production of two $ \tau $ leptons through $ t $-channel LQ exchange. Exclusive LQ couplings to b quarks and $ \tau $ leptons are assumed. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The hatches indicate the excluded side of the parameter space with respect to the observed limit. The region with blue shading shows the parameter space preferred by one of the models proposed to explain the B physics anomalies [61].

png pdf
Figure 9-a:
Observed and expected upper limit at the 95% CL on the coupling strength $ \lambda $ of a scalar LQ model determined by considering only the nonresonant production of two $ \tau $ leptons through $ t $-channel LQ exchange. Exclusive LQ couplings to b quarks and $ \tau $ leptons are assumed. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The hatches indicate the excluded side of the parameter space with respect to the observed limit. The region with blue shading shows the parameter space preferred by one of the models proposed to explain the B physics anomalies [61].

png pdf
Figure 9-b:
Observed and expected upper limit at the 95% CL on the coupling strength $ \lambda $ of a vector LQ model determined by considering only the nonresonant production of two $ \tau $ leptons through $ t $-channel LQ exchange. Exclusive LQ couplings to b quarks and $ \tau $ leptons are assumed. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The hatches indicate the excluded side of the parameter space with respect to the observed limit. The region with blue shading shows the parameter space preferred by one of the models proposed to explain the B physics anomalies [61].
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
The sources of uncertainty considered, categorized as to whether they affect the rate or shape of the distributions. ``s.d.'' refers to the standard deviation of the input variable and ``(mis)ID'' stands for ``(mis)identification''.

png pdf
Table 2:
Best-fit LQ cross sections $ \sigma_\text{fit} $ for various masses and coupling strengths $ \lambda $, and the corresponding local significance $ z $ (given in standard deviations) for different production modes individually, as well as their combination. The look-elsewhere effect is negligible.
Summary
A search has been presented for a third-generation leptoquark (LQ) decaying to a $ \tau $ lepton and a b quark. Events with $ \tau $ leptons and a varying number of jets originating from b quarks are considered, targeting the single and pair production of the LQs, as well as the nonresonant production of two $ \tau $ leptons through $ t $-channel LQ exchange. The search uses proton-proton collision data at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV recorded with the CMS detector and corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$ ^{-1} $. Upper limits are set on third-generation scalar and vector LQ production cross sections as a function of LQ mass, and results are compared with theoretical predictions to obtain lower limits on the LQ mass. At 95% confidence level, third-generation LQs decaying to a $ \tau $ lepton and a b quark with unit coupling ($ \lambda= $ 1) are excluded for masses below 1.22 TeV for a scalar model, and below 1.50 (1.82) TeV for a vector model with a coupling parameter $ \kappa= $ 0 (1). For $ \lambda= $ 2.5 the lower limits are 1.31 TeV for a scalar model, and 1.73 (1.88) TeV for a vector model with $ \kappa= $ 0 (1). The study of nonresonant $ \tau\tau $ production through $ t $-channel LQ exchange allows lower limits on the LQ mass of up to 2.3 TeV to be obtained. Upper limits are also set on the coupling strengths of scalar and vector LQs as functions of their mass. The observed data are found to agree with the standard model expectation within 2 standard deviations below a coupling strength of $ \lambda= $ 1.5. For a benchmark LQ model with a mass of 2 TeV and a coupling strength of 2.5, the data show an excess with a local significance of 2.8 standard deviations above the standard model expectation. Consequently, the observed upper limits on the LQ production cross section are about three times larger than expected for this benchmark. The present excess is driven by events with at least one highly energetic jet but no b-tagged jets, indicating the need for future similar analyses to consider alternative signal models.
References
1 ATLAS Collaboration Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC PLB 716 (2012) 1 1207.7214
2 CMS Collaboration Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC PLB 716 (2012) 30 CMS-HIG-12-028
1207.7235
3 CMS Collaboration Observation of a new boson with mass near 125 GeV in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 7 and 8 TeV JHEP 06 (2013) 081 CMS-HIG-12-036
1303.4571
4 BaBar Collaboration Evidence for an excess of $ \bar{B} \to D^{(*)} \tau^-\bar{\nu}_\tau $ decays PRL 109 (2012) 101802 1205.5442
5 BaBar Collaboration Measurement of an excess of $ \bar{B} \to D^{(*)}\tau^- \bar{\nu}_\tau $ decays and implications for charged Higgs bosons PRD 88 (2013) 072012 1303.0571
6 Belle Collaboration Observation of $ B^0 \to D^{*-} \tau^+ \nu_\tau $ decay at Belle PRL 99 (2007) 191807 0706.4429
7 Belle Collaboration Observation of $ B^+ \to \bar{D}^{*0} \tau^+ \nu_\tau $ and evidence for $ B^+ \to \bar{D}^0 \tau^+ \nu_\tau $ at Belle PRD 82 (2010) 072005 1005.2302
8 Belle Collaboration Measurement of the branching ratio of $ \bar{B} \to D^{(\ast)} \tau^- \bar{\nu}_\tau $ relative to $ \bar{B} \to D^{(\ast)} \ell^- \bar{\nu}_\ell $ decays with hadronic tagging at Belle PRD 92 (2015) 072014 1507.03233
9 Belle Collaboration Measurement of the branching ratio of $ \bar{B}^0 \rightarrow D^{*+} \tau^- \bar{\nu}_{\tau} $ relative to $ \bar{B}^0 \rightarrow D^{*+} \ell^- \bar{\nu}_{\ell} $ decays with a semileptonic tagging method PRD 94 (2016) 072007 1607.07923
10 Belle Collaboration Measurement of the $ \tau $ lepton polarization and $ R(D^*) $ in the decay $ \bar{B} \to D^* \tau^- \bar{\nu}_\tau $ PRL 118 (2017) 211801 1612.00529
11 Belle Collaboration Measurement of the $ \tau $ lepton polarization and $ R(D^*) $ in the decay $ \bar{B} \rightarrow D^* \tau^- \bar{\nu}_\tau $ with one-prong hadronic $ \tau $ decays at Belle PRD 97 (2018) 012004 1709.00129
12 LHCb Collaboration Measurement of the ratio of branching fractions $ \mathcal{B}(\bar{B}^0 \to D^{*+}\tau^{-}\bar{\nu}_{\tau})/\mathcal{B}(\bar{B}^0 \to D^{*+}\mu^{-}\bar{\nu}_{\mu}) $ PRL 115 (2015) 111803 1506.08614
13 LHCb Collaboration Measurement of the ratio of the $ B^0 \to D^{*-} \tau^+ \nu_{\tau} $ and $ B^0 \to D^{*-} \mu^+ \nu_{\mu} $ branching fractions using three-prong $ \tau $-lepton decays PRL 120 (2018) 171802 1708.08856
14 LHCb Collaboration Test of lepton flavor universality by the measurement of the $ B^0 \to D^{*-} \tau^+ \nu_{\tau} $ branching fraction using three-prong $ \tau $ decays PRD 97 (2018) 072013 1711.02505
15 LHCb Collaboration Measurement of the ratios of branching fractions $ \mathcal{R}(D^{*}) $ and $ \mathcal{R}(D^{0}) $ Submitted to PRL, 2023 2302.02886
16 LHCb Collaboration Test of lepton flavor universality using $ B^0 \rightarrow D^{*-}\tau^+\nu_\tau $ decays with hadronic $ \tau $ channels PRD 108 (2023) 012018 2305.01463
17 HFLAV Collaboration Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and $\tau$-lepton properties as of 2021 PRD 107 (2023) 052008 2206.07501
18 J. C. Pati and A. Salam Unified lepton-hadron symmetry and a gauge theory of the basic interactions PRD 8 (1973) 1240
19 H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow Unity of all elementary particle forces PRL 32 (1974) 438
20 J. C. Pati and A. Salam Lepton number as the fourth color PRD 10 (1974) 275
21 H. Fritzsch and P. Minkowski Unified interactions of leptons and hadrons Annals Phys. 93 (1975) 193
22 G. Senjanovic and A. Sokorac Light leptoquarks in SO(10) Z. Phys. C 20 (1983) 255
23 P. H. Frampton and B.-H. Lee SU(15) grand unification PRL 64 (1990) 619
24 P. H. Frampton and T. W. Kephart Higgs sector and proton decay in SU(15) grand unification PRD 42 (1990) 3892
25 H. Murayama and T. Yanagida A viable SU(5) GUT with light leptoquark bosons Mod. Phys. Lett. A 7 (1992) 147
26 S. Dimopoulos and L. Susskind Mass without scalars NPB 155 (1979) 237
27 S. Dimopoulos Technicolored signatures NPB 168 (1980) 69
28 E. Farhi and L. Susskind Technicolor Phys. Rept. 74 (1981) 277
29 L. F. Abbott and E. Farhi Are the weak interactions strong? PLB 101 (1981) 69
30 B. Schrempp and F. Schrempp Light leptoquarks PLB 153 (1985) 101
31 J. Wudka Composite leptoquarks PLB 167 (1986) 337
32 M. Tanaka and R. Watanabe New physics in the weak interaction of $ \bar B \to D^{(*)}\tau\bar\nu $ PRD 87 (2013) 034028 1212.1878
33 Y. Sakaki, M. Tanaka, A. Tayduganov, and R. Watanabe Testing leptoquark models in $ \bar B \to D^{(*)} \tau \bar\nu $ PRD 88 (2013) 094012 1309.0301
34 I. Doršner, S. Fajfer, N. Košnik, and I. Nišandžić Minimally flavored colored scalar in $ \bar B \to D^{(*)} \tau \bar \nu $ and the mass matrices constraints JHEP 11 (2013) 084 1306.6493
35 B. Gripaios, M. Nardecchia, and S. A. Renner Composite leptoquarks and anomalies in $ B $-meson decays JHEP 05 (2015) 006 1412.1791
36 R. Alonso, B. Grinstein, and J. Martin Camalich Lepton universality violation and lepton flavor conservation in $ B $-meson decays JHEP 10 (2015) 184 1505.05164
37 L. Calibbi, A. Crivellin, and T. Ota Effective field theory approach to $ b\to s\ell\ell^{(')} $, $ B\to K^{(*)}\nu\overline{\nu} $ and $ B\to D^{(*)}\tau\nu $ with third generation couplings PRL 115 (2015) 181801 1506.02661
38 M. Bauer and M. Neubert Minimal leptoquark explanation for the $ R_{D^{(*)}} $, $ R_K $, and $ (g-2)_\mu $ anomalies PRL 116 (2016) 141802 1511.01900
39 R. Barbieri, G. Isidori, A. Pattori, and F. Senia Anomalies in $ B $-decays and $ U(2) $ flavour symmetry EPJC 76 (2016) 67 1512.01560
40 I. Doršner et al. Physics of leptoquarks in precision experiments and at particle colliders Phys. Rept. 641 (2016) 1 1603.04993
41 B. Dumont, K. Nishiwaki, and R. Watanabe LHC constraints and prospects for $ S_1 $ scalar leptoquark explaining the $ \bar B \to D^{(*)} \tau \bar\nu $ anomaly PRD 94 (2016) 034001 1603.05248
42 E. Coluccio Leskow, G. DAmbrosio, A. Crivellin, and D. Muller $ (g-2)_\mu $, lepton flavor violation, and Z decays with leptoquarks: correlations and future prospects PRD 95 (2017) 055018 1612.06858
43 D. Bečirević and O. Sumensari A leptoquark model to accommodate $ R_K^\mathrm{exp} < R_K^\mathrm{SM} $ and $ R_{K^\ast}^\mathrm{exp} < R_{K^\ast}^\mathrm{SM} $ JHEP 08 (2017) 104 1704.05835
44 A. Crivellin, D. Müller, and T. Ota Simultaneous explanation of $ R(D^{(*)}) $ and $ \mathrm{b}\to\mathrm{s}\mu^{+}\mu^{-} $: the last scalar leptoquarks standing JHEP 09 (2017) 040 1703.09226
45 D. Buttazzo, A. Greljo, G. Isidori, and D. Marzocca B-physics anomalies: a guide to combined explanations JHEP 11 (2017) 044 1706.07808
46 G. Hiller and I. Nišandžić $ R_K $ and $ R_{K^{\ast}} $ beyond the standard model PRD 96 (2017) 035003 1704.05444
47 I. Doršner, S. Fajfer, D. A. Faroughy, and N. Košnik The role of the $ S_3 $ GUT leptoquark in flavor universality and collider searches JHEP 10 (2017) 188 1706.07779
48 L. Di Luzio, A. Greljo, and M. Nardecchia Gauge leptoquark as the origin of B-physics anomalies PRD 96 (2017) 115011 1708.08450
49 L. Calibbi, A. Crivellin, and T. Li Model of vector leptoquarks in view of the $ B $-physics anomalies PRD 98 (2018) 115002 1709.00692
50 M. Bordone, C. Cornella, J. Fuentes-Martín, and G. Isidori A three-site gauge model for flavor hierarchies and flavor anomalies PLB 779 (2018) 317 1712.01368
51 G. Hiller, D. Loose, and I. Nišandžić Flavorful leptoquarks at hadron colliders PRD 97 (2018) 075004 1801.09399
52 D. Bečirević et al. Scalar leptoquarks from grand unified theories to accommodate the $ B $-physics anomalies PRD 98 (2018) 055003 1806.05689
53 L. Di Luzio et al. Maximal flavour violation: a Cabibbo mechanism for leptoquarks JHEP 11 (2018) 081 1808.00942
54 R. Barbieri and A. Tesi $ B $-decay anomalies in Pati-Salam SU(4) EPJC 78 (2018) 193 1712.06844
55 D. Marzocca Addressing the B-physics anomalies in a fundamental composite Higgs model JHEP 07 (2018) 121 1803.10972
56 A. Angelescu, D. Bečirević , D. A. Faroughy, and O. Sumensari Closing the window on single leptoquark solutions to the $ B $-physics anomalies JHEP 10 (2018) 183 1808.08179
57 J. Kumar, D. London, and R. Watanabe Combined explanations of the $ b \to s \mu^+ \mu^- $ and $ b \to c \tau^- {\bar\nu} $ anomalies: a general model analysis PRD 99 (2019) 015007 1806.07403
58 M. J. Baker, J. Fuentes-Martín, G. Isidori, and M. König High-$ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ signatures in vector-leptoquark models EPJC 79 (2019) 334 1901.10480
59 C. Cornella, J. Fuentes-Martín, and G. Isidori Revisiting the vector leptoquark explanation of the B-physics anomalies JHEP 07 (2019) 168 1903.11517
60 A. Angelescu et al. Single leptoquark solutions to the B-physics anomalies PRD 104 (2021) 055017 2103.12504
61 C. Cornella et al. Reading the footprints of the B-meson flavor anomalies JHEP 08 (2021) 050 2103.16558
62 G. Isidori, D. Lancierini, P. Owen, and N. Serra On the significance of new physics in $ b \rightarrow s \ell^{+} \ell^{-} $ decays PLB 822 (2021) 136644 2104.05631
63 J. Aebischer et al. Confronting the vector leptoquark hypothesis with new low- and high-energy data EPJC 83 (2023) 153 2210.13422
64 LHCb Collaboration Differential branching fractions and isospin asymmetries of $ B \to K^{(*)} \mu^+ \mu^- $ decays JHEP 06 (2014) 133 1403.8044
65 LHCb Collaboration Measurements of the S-wave fraction in $ B^{0}\rightarrow K^{+}\pi^{-}\mu^{+}\mu^{-} $ decays and the $ B^{0}\rightarrow K^{\ast}(892)^{0}\mu^{+}\mu^{-} $ differential branching fraction JHEP 11 (2016) 047 1606.04731
66 LHCb Collaboration Angular analysis and differential branching fraction of the decay $ B^0_s\to\phi\mu^+\mu^- $ JHEP 09 (2015) 179 1506.08777
67 LHCb Collaboration Angular analysis of the $ B^{0} \to K^{*0} \mu^{+} \mu^{-} $ decay using 3 fb$ ^{-1} $ of integrated luminosity JHEP 02 (2016) 104 1512.04442
68 LHCb Collaboration Measurement of $ CP $-averaged observables in the $ B^{0}\rightarrow K^{*0}\mu^{+}\mu^{-} $ decay PRL 125 (2020) 011802 2003.04831
69 LHCb Collaboration Angular analysis of the $ B^{+}\rightarrow K^{\ast+}\mu^{+}\mu^{-} $ decay PRL 126 (2021) 161802 2012.13241
70 Belle Collaboration Lepton-flavor-dependent angular analysis of $ B\to K^\ast \ell^+\ell^- $ PRL 118 (2017) 111801 1612.05014
71 W. Buchmuller, R. Ruckl, and D. Wyler Leptoquarks in lepton-quark collisions PLB 191 (1987) 442
72 J. Blümlein, E. Boos, and A. Kryukov Leptoquark pair production in hadronic interactions Z. Phys. C 76 (1997) 137 hep-ph/9610408
73 I. Doršner and A. Greljo Leptoquark toolbox for precision collider studies JHEP 05 (2018) 126 1801.07641
74 D. A. Faroughy, A. Greljo, and J. F. Kamenik Confronting lepton flavor universality violation in B decays with high-$ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ tau lepton searches at LHC PLB 764 (2017) 126 1609.07138
75 M. Schmaltz and Y.-M. Zhong The leptoquark hunter's guide: large coupling JHEP 01 (2019) 132 1810.10017
76 ATLAS Collaboration Search for pair production of third-generation leptoquarks decaying into a bottom quark and a $ \tau $-lepton with the ATLAS detector Submitted to EPJC, 2023 2303.01294
77 ATLAS Collaboration Search for leptoquarks decaying into the b$ \tau $ final state in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector Submitted to JHEP, 2023 2305.15962
78 CMS Collaboration Search for a singly produced third-generation scalar leptoquark decaying to a $ \tau $ lepton and a bottom quark in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JHEP 07 (2018) 115 CMS-EXO-17-029
1806.03472
79 CMS Collaboration Searches for physics beyond the standard model with the $ M_\mathrm{T2} $ variable in hadronic final states with and without disappearing tracks in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV EPJC 80 (2020) 3 CMS-SUS-19-005
1909.03460
80 CMS Collaboration Search for singly and pair-produced leptoquarks coupling to third-generation fermions in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV PLB 819 (2021) 136446 CMS-EXO-19-015
2012.04178
81 ATLAS Collaboration Search for pair production of third-generation scalar leptoquarks decaying into a top quark and a $ \tau $-lepton in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 06 (2021) 179 2101.11582
82 ATLAS Collaboration Search for new phenomena in $ pp $ collisions in final states with tau leptons, b-jets, and missing transverse momentum with the ATLAS detector PRD 104 (2021) 112005 2108.07665
83 CMS Collaboration HEPData record for this analysis link
84 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004
85 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
86 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JINST 15 (2020) P10017 CMS-TRG-17-001
2006.10165
87 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
88 J. Alwall et al. Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions EPJC 53 (2008) 473 0706.2569
89 T. Sjöstrand et al. An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
90 J. M. Campbell and R. K. Ellis An update on vector boson pair production at hadron colliders PRD 60 (1999) 113006 hep-ph/9905386
91 J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, and C. Williams Vector boson pair production at the LHC JHEP 07 (2011) 18 1105.0020
92 J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, and W. T. Giele A multi-threaded version of MCFM EPJC 75 (2015) 246 1503.06182
93 P. Nason A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms JHEP 11 (2004) 040 hep-ph/0409146
94 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method JHEP 11 (2007) 070 0709.2092
95 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
96 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and G. Ridolfi A positive-weight next-to-leading-order Monte Carlo for heavy flavour hadroproduction JHEP 09 (2007) 126 0707.3088
97 J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, P. Nason, and E. Re Top-pair production and decay at NLO matched with parton showers JHEP 04 (2015) 114 1412.1828
98 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re NLO single-top production matched with shower in POWHEG: $ s $- and $ t $-channel contributions JHEP 09 (2009) 111 0907.4076
99 E. Re Single-top Wt-channel production matched with parton showers using the POWHEG method EPJC 71 (2011) 1547 1009.2450
100 Y. Li and F. Petriello Combining QCD and electroweak corrections to production in FEWZ PRD 86 (2012) 094034 1208.5967
101 M. Czakon and A. Mitov Top++: a program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 2930 1112.5675
102 P. Kant et al. HatHor for single top-quark production: updated predictions and uncertainty estimates for single top-quark production in hadronic collisions Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 74 1406.4403
103 F. Maltoni and T. Stelzer MadEvent: automatic event generation with MadGraph JHEP 02 (2003) 027 hep-ph/0208156
104 C. Borschensky, B. Fuks, A. Kulesza, and D. Schwartl ä nder Scalar leptoquark pair production at hadron colliders PRD 101 (2020) 115017 2002.08971
105 CMS Collaboration Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements EPJC 76 (2016) 155 CMS-GEN-14-001
1512.00815
106 CMS Collaboration Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements EPJC 80 (2020) 4 CMS-GEN-17-001
1903.12179
107 CMS Collaboration Investigations of the impact of the parton shower tuning in Pythia 8 in the modelling of $ \mathrm{t\overline{t}} $ at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 and 13 TeV CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2016
CMS-PAS-TOP-16-021
CMS-PAS-TOP-16-021
108 R. D. Ball et al. Parton distributions for the LHC Run II JHEP 15 (2015) 40 1410.8849
109 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions from high-precision collider data EPJC 77 (2017) 663 1706.00428
110 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT 4---a simulation toolkit NIM A 506 (2003) 250
111 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
112 CMS Collaboration Technical proposal for the Phase-II upgrade of the Compact Muon Solenoid CMS Technical Proposal CERN-LHCC-2015-010, CMS-TDR-15-02, 2015
CDS
113 CMS Collaboration ECAL 2016 refined calibration and Run2 summary plots CMS Detector Performance Summary CMS-DP-2020-021, 2020
CDS
114 CMS Collaboration Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 16 (2021) P05014 CMS-EGM-17-001
2012.06888
115 H. Voss, A. Höcker, J. Stelzer, and F. Tegenfeldt TMVA, the toolkit for multivariate data analysis with ROOT in XI Int. Workshop on Advanced Computing and Analysis Techniques in Physics Research. . . PoS ACAT:040, 2007
link
physics/0703039
116 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P06015 CMS-MUO-16-001
1804.04528
117 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ k_{\mathrm{T}} $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
118 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
119 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV JINST 12 (2017) P02014 CMS-JME-13-004
1607.03663
120 D. Guest et al. Jet flavor classification in high-energy physics with deep neural networks PRD 94 (2016) 112002 1607.08633
121 CMS Collaboration Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P05011 CMS-BTV-16-002
1712.07158
122 CMS Collaboration Identification of b-quark jets with the CMS experiment JINST 8 (2013) P04013 CMS-BTV-12-001
1211.4462
123 CMS Collaboration Performance of reconstruction and identification of $ \tau $ leptons decaying to hadrons and $ \nu_\tau $ in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P10005 CMS-TAU-16-003
1809.02816
124 CMS Collaboration Identification of hadronic tau lepton decays using a deep neural network JINST 17 (2022) P07023 CMS-TAU-20-001
2201.08458
125 CMS Collaboration Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV using the CMS detector JINST 14 (2019) P07004 CMS-JME-17-001
1903.06078
126 B. L. Combridge and C. J. Maxwell Untangling large-$ p_\mathrm{T} $ hadronic reactions NPB 239 (1984) 429
127 CMS Collaboration Search for additional neutral MSSM Higgs bosons in the $ \tau\tau $ final state in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 09 (2018) 007 CMS-HIG-17-020
1803.06553
128 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the $ \mathrm{Z}\gamma^{*} \to \tau\tau $ cross section in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV and validation of $ \tau $ lepton analysis techniques EPJC 78 (2018) 708 CMS-HIG-15-007
1801.03535
129 CMS Collaboration Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV in 2015 and 2016 at CMS EPJC 81 (2021) 800 CMS-LUM-17-003
2104.01927
130 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurement for the 2017 data-taking period at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 13 TeV CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2018
link
CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004
131 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurement for the 2018 data-taking period at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 13 TeV CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2019
link
CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002
132 CMS Collaboration Observation of the Higgs boson decay to a pair of $ \tau $ leptons with the CMS detector PLB 779 (2018) 283 CMS-HIG-16-043
1708.00373
133 CMS Collaboration Performance of reconstruction and identification of tau leptons in their decays to hadrons and tau neutrino in LHC Run-2 CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2016
CMS-PAS-TAU-16-002
CMS-PAS-TAU-16-002
134 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the inclusive W and Z production cross sections in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV JHEP 10 (2011) 132 CMS-EWK-10-005
1107.4789
135 CMS Collaboration Determination of jet energy calibration and transverse momentum resolution in CMS JINST 6 (2011) P11002 CMS-JME-10-011
1107.4277
136 CMS Collaboration Measurement of differential $ {\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}} $ production cross sections in the full kinematic range using lepton+jets events from proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt {s} $ = 13 TeV PRD 104 (2021) 092013 CMS-TOP-20-001
2108.02803
137 ATLAS Collaboration Measurements of differential cross-sections in top-quark pair events with a high transverse momentum top quark and limits on beyond the standard model contributions to top-quark pair production with the ATLAS detector at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JHEP 06 (2022) 063 2202.12134
138 ATLAS Collaboration Differential $ {\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}} $ cross-section measurements using boosted top quarks in the all-hadronic final state with 139 fb$ ^{-1} $ of ATLAS data JHEP 04 (2023) 080 2205.02817
139 CMS Collaboration Search for a heavy resonance decaying to a top quark and a W boson at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 13 TeV in the fully hadronic final state JHEP 12 (2021) 106 2104.12853
140 J. Butterworth et al. PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II JPG 43 (2016) 023001 1510.03865
141 R. J. Barlow and C. Beeston Fitting using finite Monte Carlo samples Comput. Phys. Commun. 77 (1993) 219
142 J. S. Conway Incorporating nuisance parameters in likelihoods for multisource spectra PHYSTAT 201 (2011) 115 1103.0354
143 ATLAS and CMS Collaborations Procedure for the LHC Higgs boson search combination in summer 2011 Technical Report CMS-NOTE-2011-005, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2011-011, 2011
144 G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics EPJC 71 (2011) 1554 1007.1727
145 CMS Collaboration Searches for additional Higgs bosons and for vector leptoquarks in $ \tau\tau $ final states in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 13 TeV JHEP 07 (2023) 073 CMS-HIG-21-001
2208.02717
146 T. Junk Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics NIM A 434 (1999) 435 hep-ex/9902006
147 A. L. Read Presentation of search results: the CL$ _\text{s} $ technique JPG 28 (2002) 2693
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN