CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-TOP-21-007 ; CERN-EP-2023-113
Search for central exclusive production of top quark pairs in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with tagged protons
Submitted to J. High Energy Phys.
Abstract: A search for the central exclusive production of top quark-antiquark pairs ($ \mathrm{t} \bar{\mathrm{t}} $) is performed for the first time using proton-tagged events in proton-proton collisions at the LHC at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. The data correspond to an integrated luminosity of 29.4 fb$ ^{-1} $. The $ \mathrm{t} \bar{\mathrm{t}} $ decay products are reconstructed using the central CMS detector, while forward protons are measured in the CMS-TOTEM precision proton spectrometer. An observed (expected) upper bound on the production cross section of 0.59 (1.14) pb is set at 95% confidence level, for collisions of protons with fractional momentum losses between 2 and 20%.
Figures Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Leading Feynman diagram for $ \mathrm{t} \bar{\mathrm{t}} $ central exclusive production via $ \gamma\gamma $ fusion.

png pdf
Figure 2:
A schematic layout of one arm of CT-PPS along the LHC beam line. The RPs shown in red are those used by CT-PPS.

png pdf
Figure 3:
Normalised distribution of the relative resolution of the reconstructed $ m_{{\mathrm{t}\bar{\mathrm{t}}} } $ in simulated signal events, for the dilepton (left) and $ \ell+$jets (right) analyses. The resolution is shown only for events where the reconstruction is successful. For the $ \ell+$jets decay mode, the hatched blue and the dotted red histograms represent the distribution before and after applying the kinematic fit, respectively.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
Normalised distribution of the relative resolution of the reconstructed $ m_{{\mathrm{t}\bar{\mathrm{t}}} } $ in simulated signal events, for the dilepton $ \ell+$jets analysis. The resolution is shown only for events where the reconstruction is successful. For the $ \ell+$jets decay mode, the hatched blue and the dotted red histograms represent the distribution before and after applying the kinematic fit, respectively.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
Normalised distribution of the relative resolution of the reconstructed $ m_{{\mathrm{t}\bar{\mathrm{t}}} } $ in simulated signal events, for the dilepton $ \ell+$jets analysis. The resolution is shown only for events where the reconstruction is successful. For the $ \ell+$jets decay mode, the hatched blue and the dotted red histograms represent the distribution before and after applying the kinematic fit, respectively.

png pdf
Figure 4:
Distribution of $ \xi $ in data and background simulated samples after pileup proton mixing and pileup reweighting, in the $ \ell+$jets channel. Protons in CT-PPS arm 0 (left) and arm 1 (right), as defined in the text. The solid histograms show the expected background contributions, while the red open histograms show the expected signal shapes, normalised to a cross section of 25 pb, approximately 10$^5 $ larger than the SM cross section prediction from Ref. [32]; points with statistical error bars represent collision data. The lower panels show the data-to-prediction ratios; the hatched bands represent the relative uncertainty in the predictions.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
Distribution of $ \xi $ in data and background simulated samples after pileup proton mixing and pileup reweighting, in the $ \ell+$jets channel. Protons in CT-PPS arm 0, as defined in the text. The solid histograms show the expected background contributions, while the red open histograms show the expected signal shapes, normalised to a cross section of 25 pb, approximately 10$^5 $ larger than the SM cross section prediction from Ref. [32]; points with statistical error bars represent collision data. The lower panel shows the data-to-prediction ratio; the hatched bands represent the relative uncertainty in the predictions.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
Distribution of $ \xi $ in data and background simulated samples after pileup proton mixing and pileup reweighting, in the $ \ell+$jets channel. Protons in CT-PPS arm 1, as defined in the text. The solid histograms show the expected background contributions, while the red open histograms show the expected signal shapes, normalised to a cross section of 25 pb, approximately 10$^5 $ larger than the SM cross section prediction from Ref. [32]; points with statistical error bars represent collision data. The lower panel shows the data-to-prediction ratio; the hatched bands represent the relative uncertainty in the predictions.

png pdf
Figure 5:
Distribution of a selection of the kinematic variables of interest for the dilepton (upper) and $ \ell+$jets (lower) analysis. The solid histograms show the expected background contributions, while the red open histograms show the expected signal shapes, normalised to a cross section of 25 pb, approximately 10$^5 $ larger than the SM cross section prediction from Ref. [32]; points with statistical error bars represent collision data. The lower panels show the data-to-prediction ratios; the hatched bands represent the uncertainty in the predictions. The leftmost and rightmost bin in each histogram includes accepted events outside the histogram range.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
Distribution of $m_{\mathrm{X}}$ for the dilepton analysis. The solid histograms show the expected background contributions, while the red open histograms show the expected signal shapes, normalised to a cross section of 25 pb, approximately 10$^5 $ larger than the SM cross section prediction from Ref. [32]; points with statistical error bars represent collision data. The lower panel shows the data-to-prediction ratio; the hatched bands represent the uncertainty in the predictions. The leftmost and rightmost bin in the histogram includes accepted events outside the histogram range.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
Distribution of $y_{\mathrm{X}}$ for the dilepton analysis. The solid histograms show the expected background contributions, while the red open histograms show the expected signal shapes, normalised to a cross section of 25 pb, approximately 10$^5 $ larger than the SM cross section prediction from Ref. [32]; points with statistical error bars represent collision data. The lower panel shows the data-to-prediction ratio; the hatched bands represent the uncertainty in the predictions. The leftmost and rightmost bin in the histogram includes accepted events outside the histogram range.

png pdf
Figure 5-c:
Distribution of $\Delta R(\ell,\, \ell')$ for the dilepton analysis. The solid histograms show the expected background contributions, while the red open histograms show the expected signal shapes, normalised to a cross section of 25 pb, approximately 10$^5 $ larger than the SM cross section prediction from Ref. [32]; points with statistical error bars represent collision data. The lower panel shows the data-to-prediction ratio; the hatched bands represent the uncertainty in the predictions. The leftmost and rightmost bin in the histogram includes accepted events outside the histogram range.

png pdf
Figure 5-d:
Distribution of $m_{\mathrm{t\bar{t}}}$ for the $ \ell+$jets analysis. The solid histograms show the expected background contributions, while the red open histograms show the expected signal shapes, normalised to a cross section of 25 pb, approximately 10$^5 $ larger than the SM cross section prediction from Ref. [32]; points with statistical error bars represent collision data. The lower panel shows the data-to-prediction ratio; the hatched bands represent the uncertainty in the predictions. The leftmost and rightmost bin in the histogram includes accepted events outside the histogram range.

png pdf
Figure 5-e:
Distribution of the light jet multiplicity for the $ \ell+$jets analysis. The solid histograms show the expected background contributions, while the red open histograms show the expected signal shapes, normalised to a cross section of 25 pb, approximately 10$^5 $ larger than the SM cross section prediction from Ref. [32]; points with statistical error bars represent collision data. The lower panel shows the data-to-prediction ratio; the hatched bands represent the uncertainty in the predictions. The rightmost bin in the histogram includes accepted events outside the histogram range.

png pdf
Figure 5-f:
Distribution of the post-fit $\chi^2/$1000 for the $ \ell+$jets analysis. The solid histograms show the expected background contributions, while the red open histograms show the expected signal shapes, normalised to a cross section of 25 pb, approximately 10$^5 $ larger than the SM cross section prediction from Ref. [32]; points with statistical error bars represent collision data. The lower panel shows the data-to-prediction ratio; the hatched bands represent the uncertainty in the predictions. The rightmost bin in the histogram includes accepted events outside the histogram range.

png pdf
Figure 6:
Distribution of the BDT output in the signal region for simulated events after the fit, and for data. Left: dilepton channel; right: $ \ell+$jets channel. The different ranges of the two BDT output distributions are a consequence of the different architectures of the algorithms. The solid histograms show the expected background contributions, while the red open histograms show the expected signal shapes, normalised to a cross section of 25 pb, approximately 10$^5 $ larger than the SM cross section prediction from Ref. [32]; points with statistical error bars represent collision data. For both reconstruction modes, all signal regions are combined. The lower panels show the data-to-prediction ratios; the hatched bands represent the relative uncertainty in the predictions.

png pdf
Figure 6-a:
Distribution of the BDT output in the signal region for simulated events after the fit, and for data in the dilepton channel. The different ranges of the two BDT output distributions are a consequence of the different architectures of the algorithms. The solid histograms show the expected background contributions, while the red open histograms show the expected signal shapes, normalised to a cross section of 25 pb, approximately 10$^5 $ larger than the SM cross section prediction from Ref. [32]; points with statistical error bars represent collision data. For both reconstruction modes, all signal regions are combined. The lower panel shows the data-to-prediction ratio; the hatched bands represent the relative uncertainty in the predictions.

png pdf
Figure 6-b:
Distribution of the BDT output in the signal region for simulated events after the fit, and for data in the $ \ell+$jets channel. The different ranges of the two BDT output distributions are a consequence of the different architectures of the algorithms. The solid histograms show the expected background contributions, while the red open histograms show the expected signal shapes, normalised to a cross section of 25 pb, approximately 10$^5 $ larger than the SM cross section prediction from Ref. [32]; points with statistical error bars represent collision data. For both reconstruction modes, all signal regions are combined. The lower panel shows the data-to-prediction ratio; the hatched bands represent the relative uncertainty in the predictions.

png pdf
Figure 7:
Expected and observed 95% confidence level (CL) upper limits for the cross section of $ \mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}\to\mathrm{p}{\mathrm{t}\bar{\mathrm{t}}} \mathrm{p} $, for the dilepton and $ \ell+$jets channels separately and combined. The green and yellow bands show the 68 and 95% intervals, respectively, for the expected upper limit.
Summary
A search is reported for the central exclusive production of top quark-antiquark pairs in proton-proton interactions, $ \mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}\to\mathrm{p}{\mathrm{t}\bar{\mathrm{t}}} \mathrm{p} $, for the first time using tagged intact protons, reconstructed by the CMS-TOTEM precision proton spectrometer. The $ \mathrm{t} \bar{\mathrm{t}} $ pairs are reconstructed by the CMS detector either in the dilepton or the lepton+jets decay modes. The search is conducted both separately for the two modes, and in a combined fit. With a data sample of proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 29.4 fb$ ^{-1} $, results consistent with predictions from the standard model are obtained. An upper limit of 0.59 pb at 95% confidence level (compared to an expected limit of 1.14 pb) is set on the central exclusive production of $ \mathrm{t} \bar{\mathrm{t}} $ pairs, with fractional momentum loss of the intact protons in the range 0.02 $ < \xi < $ 0.20.
References
1 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ production cross section in the all-jet final state in $ {\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV JHEP 05 (2013) 065 CMS-TOP-11-007
1302.0508
2 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ production cross-section using $ {\mathrm{e}\mu} $ events with b-tagged jets in $ {\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 and 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector EPJC 74 (2014) 3109 1406.5375
3 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ production cross section in the all-jets final state in $ {\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV EPJC 76 (2016) 128 CMS-TOP-14-018
1509.06076
4 CMS Collaboration Measurements of the $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ production cross section in lepton+jets final states in $ {\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at 8 TeV and ratio of 8 to 7 TeV cross sections EPJC 77 (2017) 15 CMS-TOP-12-006
1602.09024
5 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ production cross section in the $ {\mathrm{e}\mu} $ channel in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 and 8 TeV JHEP 08 (2016) 029 CMS-TOP-13-004
1603.02303
6 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ production cross section in the $ \tau $+jets final state in $ {\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV using the ATLAS detector PRD 95 (2017) 072003 1702.08839
7 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the inclusive and fiducial $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ production cross-sections in the lepton+jets channel in $ {\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector EPJC 78 (2018) 487 1712.06857
8 LHCb Collaboration Measurement of forward top pair production in the dilepton channel in $ {\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 08 (2018) 174 1803.05188
9 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ production cross section, the top quark mass, and the strong coupling constant using dilepton events in $ {\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV EPJC 79 (2019) 368 CMS-TOP-17-001
1812.10505
10 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the top quark pair production cross section in dilepton final states containing one $ \tau $ lepton in $ {\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 02 (2020) 191 CMS-TOP-18-005
1911.13204
11 ATLAS Collaboration Measurements of top-quark pair single- and double-differential cross-sections in the all-hadronic channel in $ {\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV using the ATLAS detector JHEP 01 (2021) 033 2006.09274
12 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ production cross-section in the lepton+jets channel at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS experiment PLB 810 (2020) 135797 2006.13076
13 CMS Collaboration Measurement of differential $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ production cross sections in the full kinematic range using lepton+jets events from proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV PRD 104 (2021) 092013 CMS-TOP-20-001
2108.02803
14 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the inclusive $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ production cross section in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 5.02 TeV JHEP 04 (2022) 144 CMS-TOP-20-004
2112.09114
15 ATLAS and CMS Collaboration Combination of inclusive top-quark pair production cross-section measurements using ATLAS and CMS data at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 and 8 TeV JHEP 07 (2023) 213 CMS-TOP-18-014
2205.13830
16 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ production cross-section in $ {\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 5.02 TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 06 (2023) 138 2207.01354
17 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the inclusive $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ production cross section in the lepton+jets channel in $ {\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector using support vector machines PRD 108 (2023) 032014 2212.00571
18 ATLAS Collaboration Inclusive and differential cross-sections for dilepton $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ production measured in $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV $ {\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}} $ collisions with the ATLAS detector JHEP 07 (2023) 141 2303.15340
19 CMS Collaboration First measurement of the top quark pair production cross section in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13.6 TeV JHEP 08 (2023) 204 CMS-TOP-22-012
2303.10680
20 ATLAS and CMS Collaborations Combinations of single-top-quark production cross-section measurements at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 and 8 TeV with the ATLAS and CMS experiments JHEP 05 (2019) 088 CMS-TOP-17-006
1902.07158
21 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the inclusive cross-sections of single top-quark and top-antiquark $ t $-channel production in $ {\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 04 (2017) 086 1609.03920
22 CMS Collaboration Measurement of differential cross sections and charge ratios for $ t $-channel single top quark production in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV EPJC 80 (2020) 370 CMS-TOP-17-023
1907.08330
23 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the cross-section for producing a W boson in association with a single top quark in $ {\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV with ATLAS JHEP 01 (2018) 063 1612.07231
24 P. D. B. Collins An introduction to Regge theory and high-energy physics Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, ISBN~978-0-521-1-8, 1977
link
25 V. Barone and E. Predazzi High-energy particle diffraction Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, ISBN~978-3-540-42107-8, 2002
link
26 J. de Favereau de Jeneret et al. High energy photon interactions at the LHC 0908.2020
27 D. d'Enterria and J.-P. Lansberg Study of Higgs boson production and its $ \mathrm{b}\overline{\mathrm{b}} $ decay in $ {\gamma\gamma} $ processes in proton-nucleus collisions at the LHC PRD 81 (2010) 014004 0909.3047
28 S. Fayazbakhsh, S. T. Monfared, and M. Mohammadi Najafabadi Top quark anomalous electromagnetic couplings in photon-photon scattering at the LHC PRD 92 (2015) 014006 1504.06695
29 M. Łuszczak, L. Forthomme, W. Schäfer, and A. Szczurek Production of $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ pairs via $ {\gamma\gamma} $ fusion with photon transverse momenta and proton dissociation JHEP 02 (2019) 100 1810.12432
30 V. P. Gonçalves, D. E. Martins, M. S. Rangel, and M. Tasevsky Top quark pair production in the exclusive processes at the LHC PRD 102 (2020) 074014 2007.04565
31 J. Howarth Elastic potential: a proposal to discover elastic production of top quarks at the Large Hadron Collider 2008.04249
32 H.-S. Shao and D. d'Enterria gamma-UPC: automated generation of exclusive photon-photon processes in ultraperipheral proton and nuclear collisions with varying form factors JHEP 09 (2022) 248 2207.03012
33 CMS Collaboration The CMS precision proton spectrometer at the HL-LHC: Expression of interest CMS Technical Proposal CMS-NOTE-2020-008, 2020 2103.02752
34 J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra et al. Interpreting top-quark LHC measurements in the standard-model effective field theory LHC TOP WG note CERN-LPCC-2018-01, 2018 1802.07237
35 C. Baldenegro et al. Searching for anomalous top quark interactions with proton tagging and timing detectors at the LHC JHEP 08 (2022) 021 2205.01173
36 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the inclusive and differential $ {{\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}} \gamma} $ cross sections in the dilepton channel and effective field theory interpretation in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 05 (2022) 091 CMS-TOP-21-004
2201.07301
37 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the inclusive and differential $ {{\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}} \gamma} $ cross sections in the single-lepton channel and EFT interpretation at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 12 (2021) 180 CMS-TOP-18-010
2107.01508
38 ATLAS Collaboration Measurements of inclusive and differential fiducial cross-sections of $ {{\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}} \gamma} $ production in leptonic final states at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV in ATLAS EPJC 79 (2019) 382 1812.01697
39 ATLAS Collaboration Measurements of inclusive and differential cross-sections of combined $ {{\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}} \gamma} $ and $ {\mathrm{t}\mathrm{W}\gamma} $ production in the $ {\mathrm{e}\mu} $ channel at 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 09 (2020) 049 2007.06946
40 S. C. Inan and A. A. Billur Polarized top pair production in extra dimension models via photon-photon fusion at the CERN LHC PRD 84 (2011) 095002
41 CMS and TOTEM Collaborations CMS-TOTEM precision proton spectrometer TOTEM Technical Proposal CERN-LHCC-2014-021, TOTEM-TDR-003, CMS-TDR-013, 2014
link
42 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004
43 G. Ruggiero et al. Characteristics of edgeless silicon detectors for the roman pots of the TOTEM experiment at the LHC in Proc. 8th International Conference on Position Sensitive Detectors (PSD8): Glasgow, UK, 2009
NIM A 604 (2009) 242
44 F. Ravera on behalf of the CMS and TOTEM Collaborations The CT-PPS tracking system with 3D pixel detectors in Proc. 8th International Workshop on Semiconductor Pixel Detectors for Particles and Imaging (PIXEL ): Sestri Levante, Italy, 2016
JINST 11 (2016) C11027
45 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
46 CMS Collaboration Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV JINST 10 (2015) P06005 CMS-EGM-13-001
1502.02701
47 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P06015 CMS-MUO-16-001
1804.04528
48 CMS Collaboration Technical proposal for the Phase-II upgrade of the Compact Muon Solenoid CMS Technical Proposal CERN-LHCC-2015-010, CMS-TDR-15-02, 2015
CDS
49 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ k_{\mathrm{T}} $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
50 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FASTJET user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
51 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The catchment area of jets JHEP 04 (2008) 005 0802.1188
52 M. Cacciari and G. P. Salam Pileup subtraction using jet areas PLB 659 (2008) 119 0707.1378
53 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in $ {\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at 8 TeV JINST 12 (2017) P02014 CMS-JME-13-004
1607.03663
54 CMS Collaboration Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV using the CMS detector JINST 14 (2019) P07004 CMS-JME-17-001
1903.06078
55 CMS and TOTEM Collaborations Proton reconstruction with the CMS-TOTEM precision proton spectrometer JINST 18 (2023) P09009 CMS-PRO-21-001
2210.05854
56 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurement for the 2017 data-taking period at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2018
CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004
CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004
57 CMS Collaboration Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV in 2015 and 2016 at CMS EPJC 81 (2021) 800 CMS-LUM-17-003
2104.01927
58 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT 4---a simulation toolkit NIM A 506 (2003) 250
59 M. Boonekamp et al. FPMC: a generator for forward physics 1102.2531
60 V. M. Budnev, I. F. Ginzburg, G. V. Meledin, and V. G. Serbo The two-photon particle production mechanism. Physical problems. Applications. Equivalent photon approximation Phys. Rept. 15 (1975) 181
61 P. Artoisenet, R. Frederix, O. Mattelaer, and R. Rietkerk Automatic spin-entangled decays of heavy resonances in Monte Carlo simulations JHEP 03 (2013) 015 1212.3460
62 P. Nason A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms JHEP 11 (2004) 040 hep-ph/0409146
63 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method JHEP 11 (2007) 070 0709.2092
64 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG \textscbox JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
65 M. Czakon, P. Fiedler, and A. Mitov Total top-quark pair-production cross section at hadron colliders through $ \mathcal{O}({\alpha_\mathrm{S}}^4) $ PRL 110 (2013) 252004 1303.6254
66 M. Czakon et al. Top-pair production at the LHC through NNLO QCD and NLO EW JHEP 10 (2017) 186 1705.04105
67 T. Sjöstrand et al. An introduction to PYTHIA8.2 Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
68 CMS Collaboration Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements EPJC 80 (2020) 4 CMS-GEN-17-001
1903.12179
69 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions from high-precision collider data EPJC 77 (2017) 663 1706.00428
70 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JINST 15 (2020) P10017 CMS-TRG-17-001
2006.10165
71 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
72 CMS Collaboration Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in $ {\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P05011 CMS-BTV-16-002
1712.07158
73 CMS Collaboration Measurements of $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ differential cross sections in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV using events containing two leptons JHEP 02 (2019) 149 CMS-TOP-17-014
1811.06625
74 Particle Data Group , R. L. Workman et al. Review of particle physics Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022 (2022) 083C01
75 L. Breiman, J. Friedman, R. A. Olshen, and C. J. Stone Classification and regression trees Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton FL, USA. ISBN~978-0-412-04841-8, 1984
76 H. Voss, A. Höcker, J. Stelzer, and F. Tegenfeldt TMVA, the toolkit for multivariate data analysis with ROOT in Proc. 11th Int. Workshop on Advanced Computing and Analysis Techniques in Phys. Research (ACAT ): Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017
[PoS (ACAT) 040]
physics/0703039
77 J. H. Friedman Data analysis techniques for high energy particle physics in Proc. 3rd CERN School of Computing: Godøysund, Norway, 1974
link
78 R. Brun et al. HBOOK: Statistical analysis and histogramming: Reference manual CERN Program Library Long Writeups Y250, 1998
link
79 M. Cacciari et al. The $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ cross-section at 1.8 and 1.96 TeV: a study of the systematics due to parton densities and scale dependence JHEP 04 (2004) 068 hep-ph/0303085
80 J. Butterworth et al. PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II JPG 43 (2016) 023001 1510.03865
81 N. Kidonakis and N. Yamanaka Higher-order corrections for $ {\mathrm{t}\mathrm{W}} $ production at high-energy hadron colliders JHEP 05 (2021) 278 2102.11300
82 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the production cross section of a W boson in association with two b jets in $ {\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV EPJC 77 (2017) 92 CMS-SMP-14-020
1608.07561
83 CMS Collaboration $ {\mathrm{W^+}\mathrm{W^-}} $ boson pair production in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV PRD 102 (2020) 092001 CMS-SMP-18-004
2009.00119
84 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the production cross section for $ {\mathrm{Z}+\mathrm{b}} $ jets in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV PRD 105 (2022) 092014 CMS-SMP-20-015
2112.09659
85 R. J. Barlow and C. Beeston Fitting using finite Monte Carlo samples Comput. Phys. Commun. 77 (1993) 219
86 T. Junk Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics NIM A 434 (1999) 435 hep-ex/9902006
87 A. L. Read Presentation of search results: The $ \text{CL}_\text{s} $ technique JPG 28 (2002) 2693
88 G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics EPJC 71 (2011) 1554 1007.1727
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN