CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-SUS-19-003 ; CERN-EP-2019-192
Search for top squark pair production in a final state with two tau leptons in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV
JHEP 02 (2020) 015
Abstract: A search for pair production of the supersymmetric partner of the top quark, the top squark, in proton-proton collision events at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV is presented in a final state containing hadronically decaying tau leptons and large missing transverse momentum. This final state is highly sensitive to high-${\tan\beta}$ or higgsino-like scenarios in which decays of electroweak gauginos to tau leptons are dominant. The search uses a data set corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 77.2 fb$^{-1}$, which was recorded with the CMS detector during 2016 and 2017. No significant excess is observed with respect to the background prediction. Exclusion limits at 95% confidence level are presented in the top squark and lightest neutralino mass plane within the framework of simplified models, in which top squark masses up to 1100 GeV are excluded for a nearly massless neutralino.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Top squark pair production in proton-proton collisions at the LHC, producing pairs of b quarks and taus accompanied by neutrinos and LSPs in the final state.

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
Top squark pair production in proton-proton collisions at the LHC, producing pairs of b quarks and taus accompanied by neutrinos and LSPs in the final state.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
Top squark pair production in proton-proton collisions at the LHC, producing pairs of b quarks and taus accompanied by neutrinos and LSPs in the final state.

png pdf
Figure 1-c:
Top squark pair production in proton-proton collisions at the LHC, producing pairs of b quarks and taus accompanied by neutrinos and LSPs in the final state.

png pdf
Figure 1-d:
Top squark pair production in proton-proton collisions at the LHC, producing pairs of b quarks and taus accompanied by neutrinos and LSPs in the final state.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Distributions of the search variables ${{p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^\text {miss}}$, ${m_{\mathrm {T2}}}$, and ${H_{\mathrm {T}}}$ after event selection, for data and the predicted background. The histograms for the background processes are stacked, and the distributions for a few representative signal points corresponding to $ x = $ 0.5 and [$ m_{\tilde{\mathrm{t}}_{1}} $, $ m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1} $] = [300, 100], [500, 350], and [800, 300] GeV are overlaid. The lower panel indicates the ratio of the observed data to the background prediction. The shaded bands indicate the statistical and systematic uncertainties on the background, added in quadrature.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
Distributions of the search variables ${{p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^\text {miss}}$, ${m_{\mathrm {T2}}}$, and ${H_{\mathrm {T}}}$ after event selection, for data and the predicted background. The histograms for the background processes are stacked, and the distributions for a few representative signal points corresponding to $ x = $ 0.5 and [$ m_{\tilde{\mathrm{t}}_{1}} $, $ m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1} $] = [300, 100], [500, 350], and [800, 300] GeV are overlaid. The lower panel indicates the ratio of the observed data to the background prediction. The shaded bands indicate the statistical and systematic uncertainties on the background, added in quadrature.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
Distributions of the search variables ${{p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^\text {miss}}$, ${m_{\mathrm {T2}}}$, and ${H_{\mathrm {T}}}$ after event selection, for data and the predicted background. The histograms for the background processes are stacked, and the distributions for a few representative signal points corresponding to $ x = $ 0.5 and [$ m_{\tilde{\mathrm{t}}_{1}} $, $ m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1} $] = [300, 100], [500, 350], and [800, 300] GeV are overlaid. The lower panel indicates the ratio of the observed data to the background prediction. The shaded bands indicate the statistical and systematic uncertainties on the background, added in quadrature.

png pdf
Figure 2-c:
Distributions of the search variables ${{p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^\text {miss}}$, ${m_{\mathrm {T2}}}$, and ${H_{\mathrm {T}}}$ after event selection, for data and the predicted background. The histograms for the background processes are stacked, and the distributions for a few representative signal points corresponding to $ x = $ 0.5 and [$ m_{\tilde{\mathrm{t}}_{1}} $, $ m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1} $] = [300, 100], [500, 350], and [800, 300] GeV are overlaid. The lower panel indicates the ratio of the observed data to the background prediction. The shaded bands indicate the statistical and systematic uncertainties on the background, added in quadrature.

png pdf
Figure 3:
The 15 search regions defined in bins of ${{p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^\text {miss}}$, ${m_{\mathrm {T2}}}$, and ${H_{\mathrm {T}}}$.

png pdf
Figure 4:
The purities (upper row), scale factors (middle row), and $ \text {SF}^{\mathrm{e} \mu} - \text {SF}^{\mu \mu} $ (bottom row) in the different bins (as defined in Fig. 3) of the ${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}}$ CR for 2016 (left) and 2017 (right) data. The scale factor in bin 15 of the $ \mu\mu $ CR in 2016 is off the visible scale. Note that bins 14 and 15 are merged to provide a single SF for subsequent calculations.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
The purities (upper row), scale factors (middle row), and $ \text {SF}^{\mathrm{e} \mu} - \text {SF}^{\mu \mu} $ (bottom row) in the different bins (as defined in Fig. 3) of the ${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}}$ CR for 2016 (left) and 2017 (right) data. The scale factor in bin 15 of the $ \mu\mu $ CR in 2016 is off the visible scale. Note that bins 14 and 15 are merged to provide a single SF for subsequent calculations.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
The purities (upper row), scale factors (middle row), and $ \text {SF}^{\mathrm{e} \mu} - \text {SF}^{\mu \mu} $ (bottom row) in the different bins (as defined in Fig. 3) of the ${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}}$ CR for 2016 (left) and 2017 (right) data. The scale factor in bin 15 of the $ \mu\mu $ CR in 2016 is off the visible scale. Note that bins 14 and 15 are merged to provide a single SF for subsequent calculations.

png pdf
Figure 5:
Event yields in the 15 search bins as defined in Fig. 3. The yields for the background processes are stacked, and those for a few representative signal points corresponding to $ x = $ 0.5 and [$ m_{\tilde{\mathrm{t}}_{1}}, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1} $] = [300, 100], [500, 350], and [800, 300] GeV are overlaid. The lower panel indicates the ratio of the observed data to the background prediction in each bin. The shaded bands indicate the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background, added in quadrature.

png pdf
Figure 6:
Exclusion limits at 95% CL for the pair production of top squarks decaying to a ${{\tau _\mathrm {h}}} {\tau _\mathrm {h}}$ final state, displayed in the $ {m_{\tilde{\mathrm{t}}_{1}}}$-$m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1} $ plane for $ x = $ 0.25 (upper left), 0.5 (upper right) and 0.75 (lower), as described in Eq. (1). The color axis represents the observed limit in the cross section, while the black (red) lines represent the observed (expected) mass limits. The signal cross sections are evaluated using NNLO plus next-to-leading logarithmic (NLL) calculations. The solid lines represent the central values. The dashed red lines indicate the region containing 68% of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The dashed black lines show the change in the observed limit due to variation of the signal cross sections within their theoretical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 6-a:
Exclusion limits at 95% CL for the pair production of top squarks decaying to a ${{\tau _\mathrm {h}}} {\tau _\mathrm {h}}$ final state, displayed in the $ {m_{\tilde{\mathrm{t}}_{1}}}$-$m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1} $ plane for $ x = $ 0.25 (upper left), 0.5 (upper right) and 0.75 (lower), as described in Eq. (1). The color axis represents the observed limit in the cross section, while the black (red) lines represent the observed (expected) mass limits. The signal cross sections are evaluated using NNLO plus next-to-leading logarithmic (NLL) calculations. The solid lines represent the central values. The dashed red lines indicate the region containing 68% of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The dashed black lines show the change in the observed limit due to variation of the signal cross sections within their theoretical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 6-b:
Exclusion limits at 95% CL for the pair production of top squarks decaying to a ${{\tau _\mathrm {h}}} {\tau _\mathrm {h}}$ final state, displayed in the $ {m_{\tilde{\mathrm{t}}_{1}}}$-$m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1} $ plane for $ x = $ 0.25 (upper left), 0.5 (upper right) and 0.75 (lower), as described in Eq. (1). The color axis represents the observed limit in the cross section, while the black (red) lines represent the observed (expected) mass limits. The signal cross sections are evaluated using NNLO plus next-to-leading logarithmic (NLL) calculations. The solid lines represent the central values. The dashed red lines indicate the region containing 68% of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The dashed black lines show the change in the observed limit due to variation of the signal cross sections within their theoretical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 6-c:
Exclusion limits at 95% CL for the pair production of top squarks decaying to a ${{\tau _\mathrm {h}}} {\tau _\mathrm {h}}$ final state, displayed in the $ {m_{\tilde{\mathrm{t}}_{1}}}$-$m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1} $ plane for $ x = $ 0.25 (upper left), 0.5 (upper right) and 0.75 (lower), as described in Eq. (1). The color axis represents the observed limit in the cross section, while the black (red) lines represent the observed (expected) mass limits. The signal cross sections are evaluated using NNLO plus next-to-leading logarithmic (NLL) calculations. The solid lines represent the central values. The dashed red lines indicate the region containing 68% of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The dashed black lines show the change in the observed limit due to variation of the signal cross sections within their theoretical uncertainties.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Relative systematic uncertainties from different sources in signal and background yields in the 2016 and 2017 analyses combined. These values are the weighted (by the yields in the respective bins) averages of the relative uncertainties in the different search regions. For the asymmetric uncertainties, the upper (lower) entry is the uncertainty due to the upward (downward) variation, which can be in the same direction as a result of taking the weighted average. The numbers in square brackets in the heading indicate the top squark and LSP masses in GeV, respectively.

png pdf
Table 2:
Event yields along with statistical and systematic uncertainties in the 2016 and 2017 analyses combined, for different background sources and the total background in the 15 search bins, as defined in Fig. 3. The uncertainties that are smaller than 0.05 are listed as 0.0. The number of events observed in data is also shown. The notation used is $ \text {yield} ^{+\text {stat} +\text {syst}}_{-\text {stat}-\text {syst}} $.
Summary
The signature of top squark pair production in final states with two tau leptons has been explored in data collected with the CMS detector during 2016 and 2017, corresponding to integrated luminosities of 35.9 and 41.3 fb$^{-1}$, respectively. The search was performed in the final state containing an oppositely charged hadronic tau lepton pair, at least one jet identified as likely to originate from the fragmentation of a b quark, and missing transverse momentum. The dominant standard model backgrounds were found to originate from top quark pair production and processes where jets were misidentified as hadronic tau lepton decays. Control samples in data were used to estimate these backgrounds, while other backgrounds were estimated using simulation.

No significant excess was observed, and exclusion limits on the top squark mass in terms of the mass of the lightest neutralino were set at 95% confidence level within the framework of simplified models where the top squark decays via a chargino to final states including tau leptons. In such models, top squark masses are excluded up to 1100 GeV for an almost massless neutralino, and LSP masses up to 450 GeV are excluded for a top squark mass of 900 GeV. These results probe a region of the supersymmetric parameter space corresponding to high-${\tan\beta}$ and higgsino-like scenarios.
References
1 P. Ramond Dual theory for free fermions PRD 3 (1971) 2415
2 Yu. A. Golfand and E. P. Likhtman Extension of the algebra of Poincar$ \'e $ group generators and violation of p invariance JEPTL 13 (1971) 323.[Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 13 (1971) 452]
3 A. Neveu and J. H. Schwarz Factorizable dual model of pions NPB 31 (1971) 86
4 J. Wess and B. Zumino A Lagrangian model invariant under supergauge transformations PLB 49 (1974) 52
5 P. Fayet Supergauge invariant extension of the Higgs mechanism and a model for the electron and its neutrino NPB 90 (1975) 104
6 G. 't Hooft Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking NATO Sci. Ser. B 59 (1980) 135
7 R. K. Kaul and P. Majumdar Cancellation of quadratically divergent mass corrections in globally supersymmetric spontaneously broken gauge theories NPB 199 (1982) 36
8 H. P. Nilles Supersymmetry, supergravity and particle physics PR 110 (1984) 1
9 S. P. Martin A supersymmetry primer hep-ph/9709356
10 G. R. Farrar and P. Fayet Phenomenology of the production, decay, and detection of new hadronic states associated with supersymmetry PLB 76 (1978) 575
11 H. Baer et al. Collider phenomenology for supersymmetry with large tan$ \beta $ PRL 79 (1997) 986 hep-ph/9704457
12 M. Guchait and D. P. Roy Using $ \tau $ polarization as a distinctive SUGRA signature at LHC PLB 541 (2002) 356 hep-ph/0205015
13 J. Alwall, P. Schuster, and N. Toro Simplified models for a first characterization of new physics at the LHC PRD 79 (2009) 075020 0810.3921
14 LHC New Physics Working Group Collaboration Simplified models for LHC new physics searches JPG 39 (2012) 105005 1105.2838
15 CMS Collaboration Search for top squark pair production in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV using single lepton events JHEP 10 (2017) 019 CMS-SUS-16-051
1706.04402
16 CMS Collaboration Search for top squarks and dark matter particles in opposite-charge dilepton final states at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV PRD 97 (2018) 032009 CMS-SUS-17-001
1711.00752
17 CMS Collaboration Search for top-squark pair production in the single-lepton final state in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV EPJC 73 (2013) 2677 CMS-SUS-13-011
1308.1586
18 CMS Collaboration Search for direct pair production of scalar top quarks in the single- and dilepton channels in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV JHEP 07 (2016) 027 CMS-SUS-14-015
1602.03169
19 CMS Collaboration Search for top squark pair production in compressed-mass-spectrum scenarios in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV using the $ \alpha_T $ variable PLB 767 (2017) 403 CMS-SUS-14-006
1605.08993
20 CMS Collaboration Searches for pair production of third-generation squarks in $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV pp collisions EPJC 77 (2017) 327 CMS-SUS-16-008
1612.03877
21 CMS Collaboration Search for direct production of supersymmetric partners of the top quark in the all-jets final state in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 10 (2017) 005 CMS-SUS-16-049
1707.03316
22 CMS Collaboration Search for supersymmetry in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV using identified top quarks PRD 97 (2018) 012007 CMS-SUS-16-050
1710.11188
23 ATLAS Collaboration Search for direct top squark pair production in final states with two leptons in $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector EPJC 77 (2017) 898 1708.03247
24 ATLAS Collaboration ATLAS Run 1 searches for direct pair production of third-generation squarks at the Large Hadron Collider EPJC 75 (2015) 510 1506.08616
25 ATLAS Collaboration Search for top squark pair production in final states with one isolated lepton, jets, and missing transverse momentum in $ \sqrt s = $ 8 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector JHEP 11 (2014) 118 1407.0583
26 ATLAS Collaboration Search for direct top-squark pair production in final states with two leptons in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 06 (2014) 124 1403.4853
27 ATLAS Collaboration Search for top squarks in final states with one isolated lepton, jets, and missing transverse momentum in $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector PRD 94 (2016) 052009 1606.03903
28 ATLAS Collaboration Search for top squarks decaying to tau sleptons in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector PRD 98 (2018) 032008 1803.10178
29 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
30 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
31 C. Oleari The POWHEG BOX Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements 205 (2010) 36, . Loops and Legs in Quantum Field Theory
32 P. Nason A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms JHEP 11 (2004) 040 hep-ph/0409146
33 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method JHEP 11 (2007) 070 0709.2092
34 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
35 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and G. Ridolfi A positive-weight next-to-leading-order Monte Carlo for heavy flavour hadroproduction JHEP 09 (2007) 126 0707.3088
36 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re NLO single-top production matched with shower in POWHEG: s- and t-channel contributions JHEP 09 (2009) 111 0907.4076
37 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
38 T. Sjostrand et al. An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 CPC 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
39 CMS Collaboration Investigations of the impact of the parton shower tuning in Pythia 8 in the modelling of $ \mathrm{t\overline{t}} $ at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 and 13 TeV CMS-PAS-TOP-16-021 CMS-PAS-TOP-16-021
40 CMS Collaboration Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements EPJC 76 (2016) 155 CMS-GEN-14-001
1512.00815
41 CMS Collaboration Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements CMS-GEN-17-001
1903.12179
42 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT4--a simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
43 W. Beenakker, R. Hopker, M. Spira, and P. M. Zerwas Squark and gluino production at hadron colliders NPB 492 (1997) 51 hep-ph/9610490
44 A. Kulesza and L. Motyka Threshold resummation for squark-antisquark and gluino-pair production at the LHC PRL 102 (2009) 111802 0807.2405
45 A. Kulesza and L. Motyka Soft gluon resummation for the production of gluino-gluino and squark-antisquark pairs at the LHC PRD 80 (2009) 095004 0905.4749
46 W. Beenakker et al. Soft-gluon resummation for squark and gluino hadroproduction JHEP 12 (2009) 041 0909.4418
47 W. Beenakker et al. Squark and gluino hadroproduction Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 26 (2011) 2637 1105.1110
48 A. Giammanco The fast simulation of the CMS experiment J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 513 (2014) 022012
49 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
50 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ {k_{\mathrm{T}}} $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
51 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
52 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV JINST 12 (2017) P02014 CMS-JME-13-004
1607.03663
53 CMS Collaboration Jet algorithms performance in 13 TeV data CMS-PAS-JME-16-003 CMS-PAS-JME-16-003
54 CMS Collaboration Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P05011 CMS-BTV-16-002
1712.07158
55 CMS Collaboration Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JINST 10 (2015) P06005 CMS-EGM-13-001
1502.02701
56 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P06015 CMS-MUO-16-001
1804.04528
57 CMS Collaboration Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV using the CMS detector JINST 14 (2019) P07004 CMS-JME-17-001
1903.06078
58 CMS Collaboration Performance of reconstruction and identification of $ {\tau} $ leptons decaying to hadrons and v$ _{\tau} $ in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P10005 CMS-TAU-16-003
1809.02816
59 C. G. Lester and D. J. Summers Measuring masses of semiinvisibly decaying particles pair produced at hadron colliders PLB 463 (1999) 99 hep-ph/9906349
60 A. Barr, C. Lester, and P. Stephens $ {m_{\mathrm{T}2}}: $ The truth behind the glamour JPG 29 (2003) 2343 hep-ph/0304226
61 A. J. Barr and C. Gwenlan The race for supersymmetry: Using $ {m_{\mathrm{T}2}} $ for discovery PRD 80 (2009) 074007 0907.2713
62 CMS Collaboration Search for heavy neutrinos and third-generation leptoquarks in hadronic states of two $ \tau $ leptons and two jets in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JHEP 03 (2019) 170 CMS-EXO-17-016
1811.00806
63 CMS Collaboration Search for supersymmetry in events with a $ \tau $ lepton pair and missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JHEP 11 (2018) 151 CMS-SUS-17-003
1807.02048
64 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 07 (2018) 161 CMS-FSQ-15-005
1802.02613
65 A. Kalogeropoulos and J. Alwall The SysCalc code: A tool to derive theoretical systematic uncertainties 1801.08401
66 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurements for the 2016 data taking period CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001 CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001
67 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurement for the 2017 data-taking period at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004 CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004
68 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the differential Drell-Yan cross section in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV CMS-SMP-17-001
1812.10529
69 CMS Collaboration Measurements of $ \mathrm{t\overline{t}} $ differential cross sections in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV using events containing two leptons JHEP 02 (2019) 149 CMS-TOP-17-014
1811.06625
70 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the $ W^+W^- $ production cross section in pp collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS experiment PLB 773 (2017) 354 1702.04519
71 CMS Collaboration Measurement of top quark pair production in association with a Z boson in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV Submitted to JHEP CMS-TOP-18-009
1907.11270
72 CMS Collaboration Measurement of differential cross sections and charge ratios for $ t $-channel single top quark production in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV Submitted to EPJC (2019) CMS-TOP-17-023
1907.08330
73 CMS Collaboration Measurements of the pp $ \to $ WZ inclusive and differential production cross section and constraints on charged anomalous triple gauge couplings at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JHEP 04 (2019) 122 CMS-SMP-18-002
1901.03428
74 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the differential cross sections for the associated production of a $ W $ boson and jets in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV PRD 96 (2017) 072005 CMS-SMP-16-005
1707.05979
75 The ATLAS Collaboration, The CMS Collaboration, The LHC Higgs Combination Group Procedure for the LHC Higgs boson search combination in summer 2011 CMS-NOTE-2011-005
76 T. Junk Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics Nucl. Instrum. Meth A 434 (1999) 435
77 A. L. Read Presentation of search results: the CLs technique JPG 28 (2002) 2693
78 G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics EPJC 71 (2011) 1554 1007.1727
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN